» Articles » PMID: 36522604

Neural Manifold Analysis of Brain Circuit Dynamics in Health and Disease

Overview
Specialties Biology
Neurology
Date 2022 Dec 15
PMID 36522604
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent developments in experimental neuroscience make it possible to simultaneously record the activity of thousands of neurons. However, the development of analysis approaches for such large-scale neural recordings have been slower than those applicable to single-cell experiments. One approach that has gained recent popularity is neural manifold learning. This approach takes advantage of the fact that often, even though neural datasets may be very high dimensional, the dynamics of neural activity tends to traverse a much lower-dimensional space. The topological structures formed by these low-dimensional neural subspaces are referred to as "neural manifolds", and may potentially provide insight linking neural circuit dynamics with cognitive function and behavioral performance. In this paper we review a number of linear and non-linear approaches to neural manifold learning, including principal component analysis (PCA), multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), Isomap, locally linear embedding (LLE), Laplacian eigenmaps (LEM), t-SNE, and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). We outline these methods under a common mathematical nomenclature, and compare their advantages and disadvantages with respect to their use for neural data analysis. We apply them to a number of datasets from published literature, comparing the manifolds that result from their application to hippocampal place cells, motor cortical neurons during a reaching task, and prefrontal cortical neurons during a multi-behavior task. We find that in many circumstances linear algorithms produce similar results to non-linear methods, although in particular cases where the behavioral complexity is greater, non-linear methods tend to find lower-dimensional manifolds, at the possible expense of interpretability. We demonstrate that these methods are applicable to the study of neurological disorders through simulation of a mouse model of Alzheimer's Disease, and speculate that neural manifold analysis may help us to understand the circuit-level consequences of molecular and cellular neuropathology.

Citing Articles

Information Geometry and Manifold Learning: A Novel Framework for Analyzing Alzheimer's Disease MRI Data.

Akguller O, Balci M, Cioca G Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857036 PMC: 11763731. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020153.


Structured Dynamics in the Algorithmic Agent.

Ruffini G, Castaldo F, Vohryzek J Entropy (Basel). 2025; 27(1).

PMID: 39851710 PMC: 11765005. DOI: 10.3390/e27010090.


Neuro-cognitive multilevel causal modeling: A framework that bridges the explanatory gap between neuronal activity and cognition.

Grosse-Wentrup M, Kumar A, Meunier A, Zimmer M PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(12):e1012674.

PMID: 39680605 PMC: 11717354. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012674.


NeurostimML: a machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage.

Li Y, Frederick R, George D, Cogan S, Pancrazio J, Bleris L J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(3).

PMID: 38885676 PMC: 11641559. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad593e.


Adaptation and learning as strategies to maximize reward in neurofeedback tasks.

Osuna-Orozco R, Zhao Y, Stealey H, Lu H, Contreras-Hernandez E, Santacruz S Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1368115.

PMID: 38590363 PMC: 11000125. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1368115.


References
1.
Stringer C, Pachitariu M, Steinmetz N, Carandini M, Harris K . High-dimensional geometry of population responses in visual cortex. Nature. 2019; 571(7765):361-365. PMC: 6642054. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1346-5. View

2.
Russo A, Khajeh R, Bittner S, Perkins S, Cunningham J, Abbott L . Neural Trajectories in the Supplementary Motor Area and Motor Cortex Exhibit Distinct Geometries, Compatible with Different Classes of Computation. Neuron. 2020; 107(4):745-758.e6. PMC: 9395139. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.020. View

3.
Tenenbaum J, De Silva V, Langford J . A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science. 2000; 290(5500):2319-23. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2319. View

4.
Feulner B, Clopath C . Neural manifold under plasticity in a goal driven learning behaviour. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(2):e1008621. PMC: 7864452. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008621. View

5.
Yin H . On multidimensional scaling and the embedding of self-organising maps. Neural Netw. 2008; 21(2-3):160-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.12.027. View