» Articles » PMID: 36522568

Are Fascial Strains Involved in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome? An Exploratory Matched Case-control Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2022 Dec 15
PMID 36522568
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) do not have a definite cause, even if their impact on quality of life was demonstrated. Furthermore, there is evidence of myofascial dysfunctions in a large number of CPP/CPPS, so that the role of fascia can be hypothesized.

Methods: The aim of this exploratory matched case-control study was to assess whether fascial strains (FS) represent a factor associated with CPP/CPPS. The study followed the "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology" (STROBE) statement. We collected data from 189 subjects (cases: 58; controls: 131) who attended the clinic. The participants were managed through a 2:1 enrollment ratio. A standardized booklet requested for clinical information, previous FS and the following questionnaires: "National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index" (NIH-CPSI), "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" (HADS), "Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire" (FABQ). Each subject underwent a palpatory assessment to detect abnormal palpatory findings in the pelvic area.

Results: The analyses showed that episiotomy, genito-urinary infections and surgery had a significantly increased odds ratio (OR) of 4.13, 3.1 and 3.08, respectively. FS as a whole had a significantly raised OR: 2.22 (1.14 to 4.33). The analysis was adjusted for physical activity and for type of job and OR decreased to 1.94 (0.82 to 4.61), losing its significance (p = 0.129). A strong correlation between symptoms' impact and CPP/CPPS was detected (rpbs = 0.710; p < 0.001) and a moderate one (0.3 < rpbs < 0.7; p < 0.001) was found considering anxiety, depression and abnormal palpatory findings.

Conclusion: This exploratory study suggests that FS could represent an etiological factor for developing CPP/CPPS. However, further research on fascial dysfunctions and relative implications in CPP/CPPS is needed for confirmation.

Citing Articles

Evaluation and management of chronic anorectal and pelvic pain syndromes: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) position statement.

Menconi C, Marino F, Bottini C, La Greca G, Gozzo C, Losacco L Tech Coloproctol. 2024; 28(1):69.

PMID: 38907168 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02943-1.

References
1.
Fall M, Baranowski A, Fowler C, Lepinard V, Malone-Lee J, Messelink E . EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. Eur Urol. 2004; 46(6):681-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.030. View

2.
Engeler D, Baranowski A, Dinis-Oliveira P, Elneil S, Hughes J, Messelink E . The 2013 EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain: is management of chronic pelvic pain a habit, a philosophy, or a science? 10 years of development. Eur Urol. 2013; 64(3):431-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.035. View

3.
Polackwich A, Shoskes D . Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a review of evaluation and therapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016; 19(2):132-8. DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.8. View

4.
Jarrell J, Vilos G, Allaire C, Burgess S, Fortin C, Gerwin R . No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018; 40(11):e747-e787. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.015. View

5.
Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gulmezoglu M, Khan K . WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6:177. PMC: 1550236. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-177. View