» Articles » PMID: 36521881

Diagnostic Pathways for Breast Cancer in 10 International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) Jurisdictions: an International Comparative Cohort Study Based on Questionnaire and Registry Data

Abstract

Objectives: A growing body of evidence suggests longer time between symptom onset and start of treatment affects breast cancer prognosis. To explore this association, the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership Module 4 examined differences in breast cancer diagnostic pathways in 10 jurisdictions across Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK.

Setting: Primary care in 10 jurisdictions.

Participant: Data were collated from 3471 women aged >40 diagnosed for the first time with breast cancer and surveyed between 2013 and 2015. Data were supplemented by feedback from their primary care physicians (PCPs), cancer treatment specialists and available registry data.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Patient, primary care, diagnostic and treatment intervals.

Results: Overall, 56% of women reported symptoms to primary care, with 66% first noticing lumps or breast changes. PCPs reported 77% presented with symptoms, of whom 81% were urgently referred with suspicion of cancer (ranging from 62% to 92%; Norway and Victoria). Ranges for median patient, primary care and diagnostic intervals (days) for symptomatic patients were 3-29 (Denmark and Sweden), 0-20 (seven jurisdictions and Ontario) and 8-29 (Denmark and Wales). Ranges for median treatment and total intervals (days) for all patients were 15-39 (Norway, Victoria and Manitoba) and 4-78 days (Sweden, Victoria and Ontario). The 10% longest waits ranged between 101 and 209 days (Sweden and Ontario).

Conclusions: Large international differences in breast cancer diagnostic pathways exist, suggesting some jurisdictions develop more effective strategies to optimise pathways and reduce time intervals. Targeted awareness interventions could also facilitate more timely diagnosis of breast cancer.

Citing Articles

[Time intervals for diagnosis and treatment in breast cancer patients].

Sanchez Galindo B, Lopez-Torres Hidalgo J, Lopez Gonzalez A, Sanchez Martinez C, Castano Diaz M, Rabanales Sotos J Aten Primaria. 2024; 57(3):103153.

PMID: 39647235 PMC: 11666889. DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103153.


Wait times and breast cancer survival: a population-based retrospective cohort study using CanIMPACT data.

Walsh R, Lofters A, Groome P, Moineddin R, Krzyzanowska M, Griffiths R Cancer Causes Control. 2024; 35(9):1245-1257.

PMID: 38748276 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01879-z.


Association between long-term use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and the risk of breast cancer: a retrospective longitudinal observational study protocol.

Ho C, Thi Ha N, Youens D, Abhayaratna W, Bulsara M, Hughes J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e080982.

PMID: 38458796 PMC: 10928765. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080982.

References
1.
Murchie P, Campbell N, Delaney E, Dinant G, Hannaford P, Johansson L . Comparing diagnostic delay in cancer: a cross-sectional study in three European countries with primary care-led health care systems. Fam Pract. 2011; 29(1):69-78. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr044. View

2.
Nosarti C, Crayford T, Roberts J, Elias E, McKenzie K, David A . Delay in presentation of symptomatic referrals to a breast clinic: patient and system factors. Br J Cancer. 2000; 82(3):742-8. PMC: 2363314. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0990. View

3.
Nashed M, Carpenter-Kellett T, Lambert P, Musto G, Turner D, Cooke A . Wait Time from Suspicion to Surgery for Breast Cancer in Manitoba. Cureus. 2016; 8(7):e680. PMC: 4985046. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.680. View

4.
Torring M, Frydenberg M, Hamilton W, Hansen R, Lautrup M, Vedsted P . Diagnostic interval and mortality in colorectal cancer: U-shaped association demonstrated for three different datasets. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 65(6):669-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.006. View

5.
Lyratzopoulos G, Vedsted P, Singh H . Understanding missed opportunities for more timely diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic patients after presentation. Br J Cancer. 2015; 112 Suppl 1:S84-91. PMC: 4385981. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.47. View