Audit of a Computerized Version of the Manchester Triage System and a SIRS-based System for the Detection of Sepsis at Triage in the Emergency Department

Overview

Journal Int J Emerg Med

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2022 Dec 13

PMID 36513965

Authors

Ken Dewitte

Elyne Scheurwegs

Sabrina van Ierssel

Hilde Jansens

Karolien Dams

Ella Roelant

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Importance: Different triage systems can be used to screen for sepsis and are often incorporated into local electronic health records. Often the design and interface of these digitalizations are not audited, possibly leading to deleterious effects on screening test performance.

Objective: To audit a digital version of the MTS for detection of sepsis during triage in the ED.

Design: A single-center retrospective study SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=29766) presenting to an ED of a tertiary-care center who received formal triage were included.

Outcome Measures And Analysis: Calculated performance measures included sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and AUC for the detection of sepsis. Errors in the application of the specific sepsis discriminator of the MTS were recorded.

Main Results: A total of 189 (0.7%) subjects met the Sepsis-3 criteria, with 47 cases meeting the criteria for septic shock. The MTS had a low sensitivity of 47.6% (95% CI 40.3 to 55.0) for allocating sepsis patients to the correct triage category. However, specificity was high at 99.4% (95% CI 99.3 to 99.5).

Citing Articles

Development of an emergency department triage tool to predict admission or discharge for older adults.

Abugroun A, Awadalla S, Singh S, Fang M Int J Emerg Med. 2025; 18(1):26.

PMID: 39953400 PMC: 11827304. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-025-00825-3.

References

Farrohknia N, Castren M, Ehrenberg A, Lind L, Oredsson S, Jonsson H . Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011; 19:42. PMC: 3150303. DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-42. View

Wawrose R, Baraniuk M, Standiford L, Wade C, Holcomb J, Moore L . Comparison of Sepsis Screening Tools' Ability to Detect Sepsis Accurately. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016; 17(5):525-9. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2015.069. View

Gerdtz M, Waite R, Vassiliou T, Garbutt B, Prematunga R, Virtue E . Evaluation of a multifaceted intervention on documentation of vital signs at triage: a before-and-after study. Emerg Med Australas. 2013; 25(6):580-7. DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12153. View

Damiani E, Donati A, Serafini G, Rinaldi L, Adrario E, Pelaia P . Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0125827. PMC: 4422717. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125827. View

Zachariasse J, Maconochie I, Nijman R, Greber-Platzer S, Smit F, Nieboer D . Improving the prioritization of children at the emergency department: Updating the Manchester Triage System using vital signs. PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0246324. PMC: 7872278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246324. View

Nieves Ortega R, Rosin C, Bingisser R, Nickel C . Clinical Scores and Formal Triage for Screening of Sepsis and Adverse Outcomes on Arrival in an Emergency Department All-Comer Cohort. J Emerg Med. 2019; 57(4):453-460.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.036. View

Ackermann K, Baker J, Green M, Fullick M, Varinli H, Westbrook J . Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(2):e31083. PMC: 8908200. DOI: 10.2196/31083. View

Shetty A, Brown T, Booth T, Van K, Dor-Shiffer D, Vaghasiya M . Systemic inflammatory response syndrome-based severe sepsis screening algorithms in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis. Emerg Med Australas. 2016; 28(3):287-94. DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12578. View

Grissom C, Brown S, Kuttler K, Boltax J, Jones J, Jephson A . A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010; 4(4):277-84. PMC: 3811929. DOI: 10.1001/dmp.2010.40. View

10.

Fleuren L, Klausch T, Zwager C, Schoonmade L, Guo T, Roggeveen L . Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(3):383-400. PMC: 7067741. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. View

11.

Tian H, Zhou J, Weng L, Hu X, Peng J, Wang C . Accuracy of qSOFA for the diagnosis of sepsis-3: a secondary analysis of a population-based cohort study. J Thorac Dis. 2019; 11(5):2034-2042. PMC: 6588775. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.90. View

12.

Seymour C, Liu V, Iwashyna T, Brunkhorst F, Rea T, Scherag A . Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):762-74. PMC: 5433435. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. View

13.

Phungoen P, Khemtong S, Apiratwarakul K, Ienghong K, Kotruchin P . Emergency Severity Index as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38(9):1854-1859. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.005. View

14.

Mirhaghi A, Mazlom R, Heydari A, Ebrahimi M . The reliability of the Manchester Triage System (MTS): a meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med. 2016; 10(2):129-135. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12231. View

15.

Horng S, Sontag D, Halpern Y, Jernite Y, Shapiro N, Nathanson L . Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0174708. PMC: 5383046. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174708. View

16.

Chamberlain D, Willis E, Clark R, Brideson G . Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale. Emerg Med J. 2014; 32(9):690-7. PMC: 4552895. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2014-203937. View

17.

Negida A, Fahim N, Negida Y . Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 4: How to Calculate the Sample Size for a Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study based on Sensitivity, Specificity, and the Area Under the ROC Curve. Adv J Emerg Med. 2019; 3(3):e33. PMC: 6683590. DOI: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.158. View

18.

Adegbite B, Edoa J, Ndzebe Ndoumba W, Dimessa Mbadinga L, Mombo-Ngoma G, Jacob S . A comparison of different scores for diagnosis and mortality prediction of adults with sepsis in Low-and-Middlencome Countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 42:101184. PMC: 8569629. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101184. View

19.

Usman O, Usman A, Ward M . Comparison of SIRS, qSOFA, and NEWS for the early identification of sepsis in the Emergency Department. Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 37(8):1490-1497. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.058. View

20.

Graff I, Goldschmidt B, Glien P, Dolscheid-Pommerich R, Fimmers R, Grigutsch D . Validity of the Manchester Triage System in patients with sepsis presenting at the ED: a first assessment. Emerg Med J. 2016; 34(4):212-218. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205309. View