» Articles » PMID: 36512530

Improved Detection of SBDS Gene Mutation by a New Method of Next-generation Sequencing Analysis Based on the Chinese Mutation Spectrum

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Dec 13
PMID 36512530
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a useful molecular diagnostic tool for genetic diseases. However, due to the presence of highly homologous pseudogenes, it is challenging to use short-read NGS for analyzing mutations of the Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome (SBDS) gene. The SBDS mutation spectrum was analyzed in the Chinese population, which revealed that SBDS variants were primarily from sequence exchange between SBDS and its pseudogene at the base-pair level, predominantly in the coding region and splice junction of exon two. The c.258+2T>C and c.185_184TA>GT variants were the two most common pathogenic SBDS variants in the Chinese population, resulting in a total carrier frequency of 1.19%. When analyzing pathogenic variants in the SBDS gene from the NGS data, the misalignment was identified as a common issue, and there were different probabilities of misalignment for different pathogenic variants. Here, we present a novel mathematical method for identifying pathogenic variants in the SBDS gene from the NGS data, which utilizes read-depth of the paralogous sequence variant (PSV) loci of SBDS and its pseudogene. Combined with PCR and STR orthogonal experiments, SBDS gene mutation analysis results were improved in 40% of clinical samples, and various types of mutations such as homozygous, compound heterozygous, and uniparental diploid were explored. The findings effectively reduce the impact of misalignment in NGS-based SBDS mutation analysis and are helpful for the clinical diagnosis of SBDS-related diseases, the research into population variation, and the carrier screening.

Citing Articles

Molecular assessment of splicing variants in a cohort of patients with inborn errors of immunity: methodological approach and interpretation remarks.

Miguel Berenguel L, Gianelli C, Matas Perez E, Del Rosal T, Mendez Echevarria A, Robles Marhuenda A Front Immunol. 2025; 15:1499415.

PMID: 39944559 PMC: 11814461. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1499415.


Variant Allele Frequency of Pseudogene-Related Variants in Short-read Next-Generation Sequencing Data May Mislead Genetic Diagnosis: A Case of Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome.

Lee H, Lee J, Lee H, Lee J, Ko J, Kim M Ann Lab Med. 2023; 43(6):638-641.

PMID: 37387500 PMC: 10345175. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.6.638.

References
1.
. Committee Opinion No. 690 Summary: Carrier Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(3):595-596. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001947. View

2.
Rehder C, Bean L, Bick D, Chao E, Chung W, Das S . Next-generation sequencing for constitutional variants in the clinical laboratory, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021; 23(8):1399-1415. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01139-4. View

3.
Makitie O, Ellis L, Durie P, Morrison J, Sochett E, Rommens J . Skeletal phenotype in patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and mutations in SBDS. Clin Genet. 2004; 65(2):101-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.0009-9163.2004.00198.x. View

4.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J . Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17(5):405-24. PMC: 4544753. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. View

5.
Ginzberg H, Shin J, Ellis L, Morrison J, Ip W, Dror Y . Shwachman syndrome: phenotypic manifestations of sibling sets and isolated cases in a large patient cohort are similar. J Pediatr. 1999; 135(1):81-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70332-x. View