Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge of the Systematic ABCDE Approach: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal BMC Emerg Med

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2022 Dec 12

PMID 36510149

Authors

Nino H C Schoeber

Marjolein Linders

Mathijs Binkhorst

Willem-Pieter de Boode

Jos M T Draaisma

Marlies Morsink

Anneliese Nusmeier

Martijn Pas

Christine van Riessen

Nigel M Turner

Rutger Verhage

Cornelia R M G Fluit

Marije Hogeveen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability and Exposure (ABCDE) approach is a universal, priority-based approach for the assessment and treatment of critically ill patients. Although the ABCDE approach is widely recommended, adherence in practice appears to be suboptimal. The cause of this non-compliance is unknown. As knowledge is a prerequisite for adherence, the aim of this study was to assess healthcare professionals' knowledge of the ABCDE approach.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands. A digital multiple-choice assessment tool of the ABCDE approach was developed by an expert panel through a mini-Delphi method and validated by performing test item statistics and an expert-novice comparison. The validated test was sent to healthcare professionals (nurses, residents and medical specialists) of the participating departments: Anaesthesiology, Paediatrics, Emergency Department and the Neonatal, Paediatric and Adult Intensive Care Units. Primary outcome was the test score, reflecting individual level of knowledge. Descriptive statistics, regression analysis and ANOVA were used.

Results: Test validation showed a Cronbach's alpha of 0.71 and an expert-novice comparison of 91.9% (standard deviation (SD) 9.1) and 72.4% (15.2) respectively (p < 0.001). Of 954 eligible participants, 240 filled out the questionnaire. The mean (SD) test score (% of correct answers) was 80.1% (12.2). Nurses had significantly lower scores (74.9% (10.9)) than residents (92.3% (7.5)) and medical specialists (88.0% (8.6)) (p < 0.001). The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (75.9% (12.6)) and Adult Intensive Care Unit (77.4% (11.2)) had significantly lower scores than Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (85.6% (10.6)), Emergency Department (85.5% (10.4)) and Anaesthesiology (85.3% (10.6)) (p < 0.05). Younger participants scored higher than older participants (-0.30% (-0.46;-0.15) in test score/year increase in age).

Conclusion: Scores of a validated knowledge test regarding the ABCDE approach vary among healthcare professionals caring for critically ill patients. Type of department, profession category and age had a significant influence on the test score. Further research should relate theoretical knowledge level to clinical practice. Tailored interventions to increase ABCDE-related knowledge are recommended.

Citing Articles

Assessment of ABCDE approach knowledge among residents and interns in multiple Egyptian hospitals, a cross-sectional study.

Rakab M, Zaid A, Hamadein M, Hamadein S, Ashour M, El-Shamia A BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):164.

PMID: 39891231 PMC: 11786368. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06668-z.

Hospital nurses and physicians' experiences practicing patient safety work to recognize deteriorating patients: a qualitative study.

Berg A, Werner A, Knutsen I, Johannessen A BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1429.

PMID: 39558336 PMC: 11575032. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11908-x.

The ABCDE approach in critically ill patients: A scoping review of assessment tools, adherence and reported outcomes.

Bruinink L, Linders M, de Boode W, Fluit C, Hogeveen M Resusc Plus. 2024; 20:100763.

PMID: 39345661 PMC: 11437753. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100763.

Healthcare service utilisation among adults with coronary artery disease in rural Aluva, South India: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Mohandas N, Vijayakumar K, Sreedevi A, George N, Menon J, Dinesh A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(9):e084468.

PMID: 39327055 PMC: 11429362. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084468.

Effects of adaptive scaffolding on performance, cognitive load and engagement in game-based learning: a randomized controlled trial.

Faber T, Dankbaar M, Van den Broek W, Bruinink L, Hogeveen M, van Merrienboer J BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):943.

PMID: 39210381 PMC: 11360721. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05698-3.

References

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

Phillips A, Reddy S, Durning S . Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys: AMEE Guide No. 102. Med Teach. 2015; 38(3):217-28. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1105945. View

Thim T, Krarup N, Grove E, Rohde C, Lofgren B . Initial assessment and treatment with the Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach. Int J Gen Med. 2012; 5:117-21. PMC: 3273374. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S28478. View

Ceran Serdar C, Cihan M, Yucel D, Serdar M . Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020; 31(1):010502. PMC: 7745163. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502. View

Cho Y, Johnson T, VanGeest J . Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Eval Health Prof. 2013; 36(3):382-407. DOI: 10.1177/0163278713496425. View

Tormey W . Education, learning and assessment: current trends and best practice for medical educators. Ir J Med Sci. 2014; 184(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-014-1069-4. View

Jones J, Hunter D . Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995; 311(7001):376-80. PMC: 2550437. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376. View

Olasveengen T, Mancini M, Perkins G, Avis S, Brooks S, Castren M . Adult Basic Life Support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2020; 156:A35-A79. PMC: 7576327. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.010. View

Soar J, Bottiger B, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin C, Djarv T . European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161:115-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010. View

10.

Charalampopoulos D, Karlis G, Barouxis D, Syggelou A, Mikalli C, Kountouris D . Theoretical knowledge and skill retention 4 months after a European Paediatric Life Support course. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014; 23(1):56-60. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000208. View

11.

Zijlmans E, Tijmstra J, van der Ark L, Sijtsma K . Item-Score Reliability in Empirical-Data Sets and Its Relationship With Other Item Indices. Educ Psychol Meas. 2018; 78(6):998-1020. PMC: 6236637. DOI: 10.1177/0013164417728358. View

12.

Mortaz Hejri S, Jalili M . Standard setting in medical education: fundamental concepts and emerging challenges. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014; 28:34. PMC: 4153516. View

13.

Van de Voorde P, Turner N, Djakow J, de Lucas N, Martinez-Mejias A, Biarent D . European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161:327-387. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.015. View

14.

Smith K, Gilcreast D, Pierce K . Evaluation of staff's retention of ACLS and BLS skills. Resuscitation. 2008; 78(1):59-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.02.007. View

15.

Ebben R, Vloet L, Schalk D, Mintjes-De Groot J, van Achterberg T . An exploration of factors influencing ambulance and emergency nurses' protocol adherence in the Netherlands. J Emerg Nurs. 2012; 40(2):124-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.09.008. View

16.

Schebesta K, Rossler B, Kimberger O, Hupfl M . Impact of the European Paediatric Life Support course on knowledge of resuscitation guidelines among Austrian emergency care providers. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012; 78(4):434-41. View

17.

Geurtzen R, van Heijst A, Draaisma J, Kuijpers L, Woiski M, Scheepers H . Development of Nationwide Recommendations to Support Prenatal Counseling in Extreme Prematurity. Pediatrics. 2019; 143(6). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-3253. View

18.

Rasmussen M, Dieckmann P, Issenberg S, Ostergaard D, Soreide E, Ringsted C . Long-term intended and unintended experiences after Advanced Life Support training. Resuscitation. 2012; 84(3):373-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.07.030. View

19.

Cook D, Beckman T . Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006; 119(2):166.e7-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036. View

20.

Tavakol M, Dennick R . Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2016; 2:53-55. PMC: 4205511. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. View