» Articles » PMID: 36508411

Determinants of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple System Atrophy: Clinical and Genetic Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Dec 12
PMID 36508411
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Classically, cognitive impairment (CI) was not considered as a paramount feature of multiple system atrophy(MSA) in both parkinsonian(MSA-P) and cerebellar(MSA-C) motor-subtypes. Yet, growing evidence indicates currently the commonness of such deficits among MSA patients in different populations. Our aim was to evaluate the cognitive profile of MSA Tunisian patients and to analyze the underlying clinical and genetic determinants.

Methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional study, clinically-diagnosed MSA patients were included. All subjects underwent clinical and neuropsychological assessments to characterize their cognitive profile. The associations with their APOE genotype status were analyzed. Determinant of CI were specified.

Results: We included 71 MSA patients. Female gender(sex-ratio = 0.65) and MSA-P subtype(73%) were predominant. Mean age of disease onset was 59.1years. CI was found in 85.7% of patients(dementia in 12.7% and Mild cognitive impairment(MCI) in 73% of patients mainly of multiple-domain amnestic type(37.3%)). Mean MMSE score was lower among MSA-P compared to MSA-C(23.52 vs. 26.47;p = 0.027). Higher postural instability gait disorder(PIGD) and MDS-UPDRS-III scores were noted in demented MSA patients(p = 0.019;p = 0.015 respectively). The main altered cognitive domain was attention(64.8%). Executive functions and mood disorders were more affected in MSA-P(p = 0.029,p = 0.035 respectively). Clinical and neurophysiological study of dysautonomia revealed no differences across cognitive subtypes. APOE genotyping was performed in 51 MSA patients with available blood samples. Those carrying APOEε4 had 1.32 fold higher risk to develop CI, with lower MMSE score(p = 0.0001). Attention and language were significantly altered by adjusting the p value to APOEɛ4 carriers(p = 0.046 and p = 0.044 respectively). Executive dysfunction was more pronounced among MSA-PAPOEε4 carriers(p = 0.010).

Conclusion: In this study, the main determinants of CI in Tunisian MSA patients were MSA-P motor-subtype, mainly of PIGD-phenotype, disease duration and APOEε4 carrying status, defining a more altered cognitive phenotype. This effect mainly concerned executive, attention and language functions, all found to be more impaired in APOEε4 carriers with variable degrees across MSA motor-subtypes.

Citing Articles

The Spectrum of Cognitive Impairment in Atypical Parkinsonism Syndromes: A Comprehensive Review of Current Understanding and Research.

Jellinger K Diseases. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39997046 PMC: 11854393. DOI: 10.3390/diseases13020039.


Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele is associated with better performance language and visual memory in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3.

Chen X, Lin K, Ye Z, Qiu L, Qiu Y, Yuan R Eur J Neurol. 2024; 32(1):e70017.

PMID: 39731318 PMC: 11680744. DOI: 10.1111/ene.70017.


Cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease and other parkinsonian syndromes.

Giannakis A, Sioka C, Kloufetou E, Konitsiotis S J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2024; 132(3):341-355.

PMID: 39614911 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02865-0.


A challenging case presentation of multiple system atrophy cerebellar type: A rare case report from Somalia.

Sidow N, Ibrahim A, Ibrahim I, Sheikh Hassan M, Mohamed S Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(12):6183-6186.

PMID: 39376957 PMC: 11456811. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.08.145.


The Pathobiology of Behavioral Changes in Multiple System Atrophy: An Update.

Jellinger K Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).

PMID: 39000570 PMC: 11242406. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25137464.

References
1.
Bender A, Raz N . Age-related differences in memory and executive functions in healthy APOE ɛ4 carriers: the contribution of individual differences in prefrontal volumes and systolic blood pressure. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(5):704-14. PMC: 3309165. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.025. View

2.
Coon E, Singer W . Synucleinopathies. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2020; 26(1):72-92. PMC: 7745651. DOI: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000819. View

3.
Sachdev P, Blacker D, Blazer D, Ganguli M, Jeste D, Paulsen J . Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014; 10(11):634-42. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.181. View

4.
Balas M, Balash Y, Giladi N, Gurevich T . Cognition in multiple system atrophy: neuropsychological profile and interaction with mood. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2010; 117(3):369-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-009-0365-z. View

5.
Kawahara Y, Ikeda Y, Deguchi K, Kurata T, Hishikawa N, Sato K . Simultaneous assessment of cognitive and affective functions in multiple system atrophy and cortical cerebellar atrophy in relation to computerized touch-panel screening tests. J Neurol Sci. 2015; 351(1-2):24-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.02.010. View