» Articles » PMID: 36506325

Construction of the Model for Predicting Prognosis by Key Genes Regulating EGFR-TKI Resistance

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2022 Dec 12
PMID 36506325
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) will significantly benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, many LUAD patients will develop resistance to EGFR-TKI. Thus, our study aims to develop models to predict EGFR-TKI resistance and the LUAD prognosis. Two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE31625 and GSE34228) were used as the discovery datasets to find the common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in EGFR-TKI resistant LUAD profiles. The association of these common DEGs with LUAD prognosis was investigated in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Moreover, we constructed the risk score for prognosis prediction of LUAD by LASSO analysis. The performance of the risk score for predicting LUAD prognosis was calculated using an independent dataset (GSE37745). A random forest model by risk score genes was trained in the training dataset, and the diagnostic ability for distinguishing sensitive and EGFR-TKI resistant samples was validated in the internal testing dataset and external testing datasets (GSE122005, GSE80344, and GSE123066). From the discovery datasets, 267 common upregulated genes and 374 common downregulated genes were identified. Among these common DEGs, there were 59 genes negatively associated with prognosis, while 21 genes exhibited positive correlations with prognosis. Eight genes (ABCC2, ARL2BP, DKK1, FUT1, LRFN4, PYGL, SMNDC1, and SNAI2) were selected to construct the risk score signature. In both the discovery and independent validation datasets, LUAD patients with the higher risk score had a poorer prognosis. The nomogram based on risk score showed good performance in prognosis prediction with a C-index of 0.77. The expression levels of ABCC2, ARL2BP, DKK1, LRFN4, PYGL, SMNDC1, and SNAI2 were positively related to the resistance of EGFR-TKI. However, the expression level of FUT1 was favorably correlated with EGFR-TKI responsiveness. The RF model worked wonderfully for distinguishing sensitive and resistant EGFR-TKI samples in the internal and external testing datasets, with predictive area under the curves (AUC) of 0.973 and 0.817, respectively. Our investigation revealed eight genes associated with EGFR-TKI resistance and provided models for EGFR-TKI resistance and prognosis prediction in LUAD patients.

Citing Articles

DKK1 and Its Receptors in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Promising Molecular Target.

Despotidis M, Lyros O, Driva T, Sarantis P, Kapetanakis E, Mylonakis A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39795613 PMC: 11720708. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010085.


Identification and validation of a glycosyltransferase gene signature as a novel prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma.

Zhou J, Zhang K, Yang T, Li A, Li M, Peng X Heliyon. 2024; 10(8):e29383.

PMID: 38644835 PMC: 11033141. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29383.


Developments in Genetics: Better Management of Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Maioru O, Radoi V, Coman M, Hotinceanu I, Dan A, Eftenoiu A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(21).

PMID: 37958970 PMC: 10647767. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115987.


Identifying prognostic genes related PANoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma and developing prediction model based on bioinformatics analysis.

Zhang C, Xia J, Liu X, Li Z, Gao T, Zhou T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):17956.

PMID: 37864090 PMC: 10589340. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45005-6.


Targeting protein glycosylation to regulate inflammation in the respiratory tract: novel diagnostic and therapeutic candidates for chronic respiratory diseases.

Xie X, Kong S, Cao W Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1168023.

PMID: 37256139 PMC: 10225578. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1168023.

References
1.
Wang F, Tang C, Gao X, Xu J . Identification of a six-gene signature associated with tumor mutation burden for predicting prognosis in patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(7):453. PMC: 7210212. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.04.02. View

2.
Al-Dherasi A, Huang Q, Liao Y, Al-Mosaib S, Hua R, Wang Y . A seven-gene prognostic signature predicts overall survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Cancer Cell Int. 2021; 21(1):294. PMC: 8183047. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-01975-z. View

3.
Chen Z, Liu G, Hossain A, Danilova I, Bolkov M, Liu G . A co-expression network for differentially expressed genes in bladder cancer and a risk score model for predicting survival. Hereditas. 2019; 156:24. PMC: 6617625. DOI: 10.1186/s41065-019-0100-1. View

4.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

5.
Zhang F, Liu Y, Yang Y, Yang K . Development and validation of a fourteen- innate immunity-related gene pairs signature for predicting prognosis head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):1015. PMC: 7574345. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07489-7. View