» Articles » PMID: 36504959

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Between COVID-19 and H7N9 Fatal Cases: An Observational Study

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Dec 12
PMID 36504959
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020 is reminiscent of the H7N9 outbreak in 2013, which poses a huge threat to human health. We aim to compare clinical features and survival factors in fatal cases of COVID-19 and H7N9.

Methods: Data on confirmed COVID-19 and H7N9 fatal cases identified in mainland China were analyzed to compare demographic characteristics and clinical severity. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests and a restricted mean survival time model. A Cox regression model was used to identify survival factors in fatal cases of COVID-19 and H7N9.

Results: Similar demographic characteristics were observed in fatal cases of COVID-19 and H7N9. The proportion of fatal cases of H7N9 receiving antibiotics, antiviral drugs, and oxygen treatment was higher than that of COVID-19. The potential protective factors for fatal COVID-19 cases were receiving antibiotics (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61), oxygen treatment (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.99), and corticosteroids (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.35-0.62). In contrast, antiviral drugs (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.08-0.56) and corticosteroids (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.29-0.69) were the protective factors for H7N9 fatal cases.

Conclusion: The proportion of males, those having one or more underlying medical condition, and older age was high in COVID-19 and H7N9 fatal cases. Offering antibiotics, oxygen treatment, and corticosteroids to COVID-19 cases extended the survival time. Continued global surveillance remains an essential component of pandemic preparedness.

References
1.
Wiersinga W, Rhodes A, Cheng A, Peacock S, Prescott H . Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA. 2020; 324(8):782-793. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839. View

2.
Wang X, Jiang H, Wu P, Uyeki T, Feng L, Lai S . Epidemiology of avian influenza A H7N9 virus in human beings across five epidemics in mainland China, 2013-17: an epidemiological study of laboratory-confirmed case series. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017; 17(8):822-832. PMC: 5988584. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30323-7. View

3.
Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, Liang W, Ou C, He J . Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(18):1708-1720. PMC: 7092819. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. View

4.
Li C, Chen H . H7N9 Influenza Virus in China. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020; 11(8). PMC: 8327827. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038349. View

5.
Gao H, Lu H, Cao B, Du B, Shang H, Gan J . Clinical findings in 111 cases of influenza A (H7N9) virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(24):2277-85. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305584. View