» Articles » PMID: 36501577

A Comparative Analysis of Chemical, Plasma and In Situ Modification of Graphene Nanoplateletes for Improved Performance of Fused Filament Fabricated Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composites Parts

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Dec 11
PMID 36501577
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The limited number of materials and mechanical weakness of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts are deficiencies of FDM technology. The preparation of polymer composites parts with suitable filler is a promising method to improve the properties of the 3D printed parts. However, the agglomerate of filler makes its difficult disperse in the matrix. In this work, graphene nanoplatelets (GnPs) were surface modified with chemical, low-temperature plasma and in situ methods, in order to apply them as fillers for thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Following its modification, the surface chemical composition of GnPs was analyzed. Three wt% of surface-modified GnPs were incorporated into TPU to produce FDM filaments using a melting compounding process. Their effects on rheology properties and electrical conductivity on TPU/GnPs composites, as well as the dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties of FDM parts, are compared. The images of sample facture surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) to determine the dispersion of GnPs. Results indicate that chemical treatment of GnPs with zwitterionic surfactant is a good candidate to significantly enhance TPU filaments, when considering the FDM parts demonstrated the highest mechanical properties and lowest dimensional accuracy.

Citing Articles

Nanomaterials Reinforced Polymer Filament for Fused Deposition Modeling: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Luo X, Cheng H, Wu X Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(14).

PMID: 37514370 PMC: 10383500. DOI: 10.3390/polym15142980.

References
1.
Zhang G, Wang F, Dai J, Huang Z . Effect of Functionalization of Graphene Nanoplatelets on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Silicone Rubber Composites. Materials (Basel). 2017; 9(2). PMC: 5456511. DOI: 10.3390/ma9020092. View

2.
Viji S, Anbazhagi M, Ponpandian N, Mangalaraj D, Jeyanthi S, Santhanam P . Diatom-based label-free optical biosensor for biomolecules. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014; 174(3):1166-73. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-014-1040-x. View

3.
Gao S, Liu R, Xin H, Liang H, Wang Y, Jia J . The Surface Characteristics, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of PEEK Printed by Fused Deposition Modeling with Different Raster Angles. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(1). PMC: 8747553. DOI: 10.3390/polym14010077. View

4.
Benwood C, Anstey A, Andrzejewski J, Misra M, Mohanty A . Improving the Impact Strength and Heat Resistance of 3D Printed Models: Structure, Property, and Processing Correlationships during Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) of Poly(Lactic Acid). ACS Omega. 2019; 3(4):4400-4411. PMC: 6641607. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00129. View

5.
Thumsorn S, Prasong W, Kurose T, Ishigami A, Kobayashi Y, Ito H . Rheological Behavior and Dynamic Mechanical Properties for Interpretation of Layer Adhesion in FDM 3D Printing. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(13). PMC: 9268954. DOI: 10.3390/polym14132721. View