» Articles » PMID: 36498740

Quality of Life Following Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatments in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Dec 11
PMID 36498740
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) improvement is one of the main outcomes in the management of pelvic organ prolapse as a chronic illness in women. This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of surgical or pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on quality of life. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was applied. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched for original articles that evaluated the QoL before and after surgical interventions or pessary in pelvic organ prolapse from 1 January 2012 until 30 June 2022 with a combination of proper keywords. Included studies were categorized based on interventions, and they were tabulated to summarize the results. Results: Overall, 587 citations were retrieved. Of these, 76 articles were found eligible for final review. Overall, three categories of intervention were identified: vaginal surgeries (47 studies), abdominal surgeries (18 studies), and pessary intervention (11 studies). Almost all interventions were associated with improved quality of life. The results of the meta-analysis showed a significant association between the employment of surgical approach techniques (including vaginal and abdominal surgeries) and the quality of life (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) (MD: −48.08, 95% CI: −62.34 to −33.77, p-value < 0.01), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) (MD: −33.41, 95% CI: −43.48 to −23.34, p < 0.01)) and sexual activity of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ) (MD: 4.84, 95% CI: 1.75 to 7.92, p < 0.01)). Furthermore, narrative synthesis for studies investigating the effect of the pessary approach showed a positive association between the use of this instrument and improvement in the quality of life and sexual activity. Conclusions: The results of our study revealed a significant improvement in the women’s quality of life following abdominal and vaginal reconstructive surgery. The use of pessary was also associated with increased patient quality of life.

Citing Articles

Quality of Life Assessment After Pelvic Prolapse Surgery With and Without Mesh: A Literature Review.

Pirtea M, Balint O, Secosan C, Costachescu D, Dabica A, Navolan D J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004855 PMC: 11856146. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041325.


Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Postoperative Quality of Life in Ethiopian Women.

Pouch G, Arja A, Brookins O, Jacks C, Gebregziabher M, Swift S Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(10):2003-2011.

PMID: 39254841 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05910-4.


Long-Term Self-Management of Vaginal Cube Pessaries Can Improve Sexual Life in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Results from a Secondary Analysis.

Nemeth Z, Vida P, Markovic P, Gubas P, Kovacs K, Farkas B Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(12):2329-2334.

PMID: 39101959 PMC: 11732951. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05882-5.


Effectiveness and safety of a novel, collapsible pessary for management of pelvic organ prolapse.

Strohbehn K, Wadensweiler P, Richter H, Grimes C, Rardin C, Rosenblatt P Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 231(2):271.e1-271.e10.

PMID: 38761837 PMC: 11283992. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.009.


Validation of the Russian Version of the Prolapse Quality-of-life Questionnaire and its Application to Assess the Impact of Pelvic Organ Prolapse on Quality of Life and the Effect of Treatment in Women Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery.

Shakhaliev R, Kubin N, Nikitina T, Ionova T, Digesu A, Shkarupa D Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(4):863-872.

PMID: 38478118 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05764-w.


References
1.
Bartuzi A, Futyma K, Kulik-Rechberger B, Rechberger T . Self-perceived quality of life after pelvic organ prolapse reconstructive mesh surgery: prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 169(1):108-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.018. View

2.
Lopez G, Lafuente R, Checa M, Carreras R, Brassesco M . Diagnostic value of sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm high-magnification for predicting outcome of assisted reproduction treatment. Asian J Androl. 2013; 15(6):790-4. PMC: 3854053. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2013.81. View

3.
van Zanten F, Lenters E, Broeders I, Schraffordt Koops S . Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy: not only for vaginal vault suspension? An observational cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2021; 33(2):377-384. PMC: 8803761. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04740-y. View

4.
Lo T, Ng K, Huang T, Chen Y, Lin Y, Hsieh W . Anterior-Apical Transvaginal Mesh (Surelift) for Advanced Urogenital Prolapse: Surgical and Functional Outcomes at 1 Year. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 28(1):107-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.002. View

5.
Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Villa F, Sanguinetti A, Boni M, Mariani E . Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2014; 12 Suppl 2:S153-S159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.359. View