» Articles » PMID: 36498478

Corneal Aberrations and Thickness in Adults Born Small, Appropriate, or Large for Gestational Age at Term

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Dec 11
PMID 36498478
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/Aims: This study investigated whether there are changes in corneal surface regularity and corneal thickness in adults born small, appropriate, or large for gestational age at term. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved prospective Scheimpflug imaging of the cornea (Pentacam®) to compare the corneal thickness and aberrations between adults classified as small for gestational age (SGA), normal birth weight (BW), and large for gestational age (LGA). Multivariable linear regression was applied to analyze associations with gestational age, BW percentile, placental insufficiency, preeclampsia, and breastfeeding. Results: In total, 448 eyes of 261 individuals born full term (aged 29.9 ± 9.5 years, 140 females) were examined, including 29 severe SGA (BW < 3rd percentile), 32 moderate SGA (BW between 3rd and <10th percentile), 132 normal BW (BW between 10th and 90th percentile), 35 moderate LGA (BW between >90th and 97th percentile), and 33 severe LGA (BW > 97th percentile). There were no differences between groups in the corneal aberrations of the total cornea as well as of the corneal front surface, except for higher-order aberrations in the front of the cornea (p = 0.032). There was an association between the increased total root mean square of higher-order aberrations and lower birth weight percentile (p = 0.004), with increased higher-order aberrations correlating with lower visual acuity and spherical equivalent. Conclusion: Restricted prenatal growth is associated with increased higher-order aberrations in adulthood.

References
1.
Wu W, Lin R, Shih C, Wang N, Chen Y, Chao A . Visual acuity, optical components, and macular abnormalities in patients with a history of retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(9):1907-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.040. View

2.
Read S, Collins M, Carney L . The influence of eyelid morphology on normal corneal shape. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48(1):112-9. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0675. View

3.
Wallman J, Winawer J . Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron. 2004; 43(4):447-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.008. View

4.
Pan C, Qian Y, Zhong H, Li J, Liu H, Chen Q . Central Corneal Thickness and Its Association with Birth Parameters in Chinese Adolescents. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2019; 26(5):360-366. DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2019.1632903. View

5.
Fiess A, Urschitz M, Marx-Gross S, Nagler M, Wild P, Munzel T . Association of Birth Weight with Central and Peripheral Corneal Thickness in Adulthood-Results from the Population-Based German Gutenberg Health Study. Children (Basel). 2021; 8(11). PMC: 8625912. DOI: 10.3390/children8111006. View