» Articles » PMID: 36496906

Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2022 Dec 11
PMID 36496906
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A detailed understanding of what is usual for a species under optimal conditions is critical for identifying and interpreting different features of body function that have known impacts on animal welfare and its assessment. When applying the Five Domains Model to assess animal welfare, the key starting point is therefore to acquire extensive species-specific knowledge relevant to each of the four physical/functional Domains of the Model. These Domains, 1 to 4, address areas where objective information is evaluated and collated. They are: (1) Nutrition; (2) Physical environment; (3) Health; and (4) Behavioural interactions. It is on the basis of this detailed knowledge that cautious inferences can then be made about welfare-relevant mental experiences animals may have, aligned with Domain 5, Mental State. However, this review is focused entirely on the first four Domains in order to provide a novel holistic framework to collate the multidisciplinary knowledge of horses required for undertaking comprehensive welfare assessments. Thus, inferring the potential mental experiences aligned with Domain 5, the final step in model-based welfare assessments, is not considered here. Finally, providing extensive information on free-roaming horses enables a better understanding of the impacts of human interventions on the welfare of horses in both free-roaming and domestic situations.

Citing Articles

Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective.

Lovasz L, Sommer-Trembo C, Barth J, Scasta J, Grancharova-Hill R, Lemoine R Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(1):407-427.

PMID: 39279124 PMC: 11718625. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13146.


Rethinking the utility of the Five Domains model.

Hampton J, Hemsworth L, Hemsworth P, Hyndman T, Sandoe P Anim Welf. 2024; 32:e62.

PMID: 38487458 PMC: 10936274. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2023.84.


Mental Experiences in Wild Animals: Scientifically Validating Measurable Welfare Indicators in Free-Roaming Horses.

Harvey A, Beausoleil N, Ramp D, Mellor D Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37174544 PMC: 10177449. DOI: 10.3390/ani13091507.

References
1.
Ashley F, Waterman-Pearson A, Whay H . Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Vet J. 2005; 37(6):565-75. DOI: 10.2746/042516405775314826. View

2.
Boyd L . Behavior problems of equids in zoos. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 1986; 2(3):653-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30713-7. View

3.
Hampson B, Connelley A, de Laat M, Mills P, Pollitt C . Sole depth and weight-bearing characteristics of the palmar surface of the feet of feral horses and domestic Thoroughbreds. Am J Vet Res. 2011; 72(6):727-35. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.72.6.727. View

4.
Grange S, Duncan P, Gaillard J . Poor horse traders: large mammals trade survival for reproduction during the process of feralization. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276(1663):1911-9. PMC: 2674491. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1828. View

5.
Basile M, Boivin S, Boutin A, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M, Lemasson A . Socially dependent auditory laterality in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn. 2009; 12(4):611-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0220-5. View