» Articles » PMID: 36496765

Comparative Efficacy in Challenge Dose Models of a Toxin Expressing Whole-Cell Vaccine Against Eight Serovars of in Pigs

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2022 Dec 11
PMID 36496765
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

is a major economically significant bacterial respiratory pig pathogen, and whole cell vaccines are used to prevent disease. However, there is little data available on multi-serovar whole cell vaccine protection. Therefore, we determined the protective efficacies of a whole-cell serovar 1 and 2 vaccine comprising ApxI-III toxins (C-vaccine, Coglapix, Ceva, France) against serovars 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9/11, and 13. The infection doses used induced disease representative of endemic field conditions, and standard protocols were used for all studies. Protection against homologous serovars 1 and 2 significantly reduced lung lesion scores (LLS) compared to positive controls: = 0.00007 and = 0.00124, respectively. The protection against heterologous serovars 4, 5, 6, 7, 9/11, and 13 also significantly reduced LLS: range = 2.9 × 10 to = 0.00953. As adjudged by the estimated random effect, reproducibility between studies was high. A highly significant serovar-independent reduction of pathological lung lesions by the C-vaccine was found for all the serovars tested (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9/11, and 13). We conclude that the C-vaccine gives high serovar-independent protection against disease and is suitable for this use in the field.

Citing Articles

Temporal and Serotypic Dynamics of in South African Porcine Populations: A Retrospective Study from 1985 to 2023.

Seakamela E, Henton M, Jonker A, Kayoka-Kabongo P, Matle I Pathogens. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 39057825 PMC: 11280335. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13070599.


Examination of the Virulence of Serovar 16 in Pigs.

Tenk M, Toth G, Marton Z, Sarkozi R, Szoradi A, Makrai L Vet Sci. 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38393080 PMC: 10892955. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11020062.


Histopathological lesions of serotype 8 in infected pigs.

Papatsiros V, Stylianaki I, Tsokana C, Papakonstantinou G, Christophorou M, Papaioannou N Vet Res Forum. 2023; 14(7):401-404.

PMID: 37564359 PMC: 10410112. DOI: 10.30466/vrf.2022.556971.3539.

References
1.
Kim B, Hur J, Lee J, Choi Y, Lee J . Molecular serotyping and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolated from pigs in South Korea. Vet Q. 2016; 36(3):137-44. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2016.1155241. View

2.
Chiers K, De Waele T, Pasmans F, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F . Virulence factors of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae involved in colonization, persistence and induction of lesions in its porcine host. Vet Res. 2010; 41(5):65. PMC: 2899255. DOI: 10.1051/vetres/2010037. View

3.
Sebunya T, Saunders J, OSBORNE A . Dose response relationship of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae aerosols in pigs. Can J Comp Med. 1983; 47(1):54-6. PMC: 1235884. View

4.
Holmgren N, Lundeheim N, Wallgren P . Infections with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in fattening pigs. Influence of piglet production systems and influence on production parameters. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1999; 46(8):535-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1999.tb01246.x. View

5.
Langford P, Stringer O, Li Y, Bosse J . Application of the MISTEACHING(S) disease susceptibility framework to to identify research gaps: an exemplar of a veterinary pathogen. Anim Health Res Rev. 2021; 22(2):120-135. DOI: 10.1017/S1466252321000074. View