Examining the Clinical Impact of Rapid Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction-based Diagnostic Testing for Bloodstream Infections in a National Cohort of the Veterans Health Administration
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Study Objective: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a significant cause of mortality. Use of a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based blood culture identification panel (BCID) may improve antimicrobial utilization and clinical outcomes by shortening the time to appropriate therapy and de-escalating antibiotics among patients on overly broad-spectrum empiric therapy. The effect of BCID on clinical outcomes across varying institutional antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) practices is unclear. This study evaluated clinical outcomes associated with the "real-world" implementation of BCID in a national health system with varying ASP practices.
Design: National, multicenter, retrospective, pre-post quasi-experimental study of hospitalized patients admitted from 2015 to 2020 to VHA facilities, which introduced the BCID for ≥1 year.
Setting: United States Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals with BCID.
Patients: Hospitalized VHA patients with ≥1 blood culture positive for bacteria featured on the BCID panel.
Intervention: Comparison of outcomes between the pre- and post-BCID implementation groups.
Measurements: Outcomes evaluated included early antimicrobial de-escalation within 48 h, defined as reduction in antimicrobial spectrum scores, time to appropriate therapy, and 30-day mortality.
Main Results: A total of 4138 patients (pre-BCID, n = 2100; post-BCID, n = 2038) met the study criteria. Implementation of BCID was associated with significant improvements in early antimicrobial de-escalation (34.6%: pre-BCID vs. 38.1%: post-BCID; p = 0.022), which persisted after adjusting for other covariates (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.20; p = 0.011). Median time to appropriate therapy was shorter in the post-BCID implementation group relative to the pre-BCID group (9 h: pre-BCID vs. 8 h: post-BCID, respectively, p = 0.005), and a greater percentage of patients received early appropriate antimicrobial therapy within 48 h in the post-BCID implementation group (91.7%: pre-BCID vs. 93.8%: post-BCID; p = 0.008). In the multivariable regression analysis, BCID implementation was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of appropriate therapy within 48 h (aRR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; p = 0.020). There was no difference in 30-day mortality between groups overall (12.6% pre-BCID vs. 11.2% post-BCID; p = 0.211).
Conclusions: In a "real-world" clinical setting, the implementation of BCID was associated with clinical improvements in antimicrobial utilization. The BCID platform may serve as a useful adjunct for BSI management in facilities with ASP.
Deja E, Greenfield A, Sastry S, Rittmann B Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025; 5(1):e18.
PMID: 39911507 PMC: 11795432. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.488.
Kramme E, Kading N, Graf T, Schmoll K, Linnen H, Nagel K Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025; 14:1513408.
PMID: 39906215 PMC: 11790461. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1513408.
Candel F, Salavert M, Canton R, Del Pozo J, Galan-Sanchez F, Navarro D Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):440.
PMID: 39736683 PMC: 11687037. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05224-3.
Manuel C, Maynard R, Simpkins S, Haro M, Humphries R J Clin Microbiol. 2024; 62(10):e0102024.
PMID: 39297627 PMC: 11481509. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01020-24.
Kuruma K, Funakoshi H, Shibata M, Okita K, Suwa J, Tame T Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66282.
PMID: 39238738 PMC: 11376315. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66282.