» Articles » PMID: 36483622

Antiplatelet Efficacy of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Mediterranean Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Coronary Syndromes: A Crossover Pharmacodynamic Investigation

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have augmented platelet reactivity and diminished responsiveness to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor, a more potent P2Y inhibitor, is clinically superior to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes, although its role in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) is still the subject of debate. The aim of this investigation was to compare the pharmacodynamic effectiveness of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in Mediterranean DM patients with CCS.

Materials And Methods: In this prospective, randomized, crossover study, patients ( = 20) were randomized (1:1) to receive, on top of aspirin therapy, either ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (LD)/90 mg maintenance dose (MD) b.i.d. or clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg MD o.d. for 1 week in a crossover fashion with a 2-4 week washout period between regimens. Platelet function measurements were performed at 4 timepoints in each period (baseline, 2 h and 24 h after LD, and 1 week), including light transmission aggregometry (LTA, primary endpoint), VASP assay, Multiplate and VerifyNow P2Y.

Results: The ticagrelor LD achieved greater platelet inhibitory effect than clopidogrel LD, assessed with LTA (20 μM ADP as agonist), at 2 h (34.9 ± 3.9% vs. 63.6 ± 3.9%; < 0.001) and 24 h (39.4 ± 3.5% vs. 52.3 ± 3.8%; = 0.014). After 1 week of therapy, platelet reactivity was again significantly inferior with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (30.7 ± 3.0% vs. 54.3 ± 3.0%; < 0.001). The results were consistent with the other platelet function assays employed.

Conclusion: In Mediterranean patients with DM and CCS, ticagrelor provides a more potent antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel after the LD and during the maintenance phase of therapy.

Clinical Trial Registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT02457130].

Citing Articles

Comparison of 1-Year Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Type 2 Diabetes Patients After Implantation of Small Diameter Stents.

Algazzar A, Aljondi R, Metwalli E, Dhaher G, Mushaeb H, Aljadani R Anatol J Cardiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39763313 PMC: 11793804. DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4603.


Prospective Trial on the Pharmacokinetics of Clopidogrel in Hemodialysis Patients.

Grafeneder J, van Os W, Minichmayr I, Kovacevic Miljevic K, Reiter B, Saemann M Kidney Int Rep. 2024; 9(10):2970-2980.

PMID: 39430173 PMC: 11489422. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.07.029.

References
1.
. Addendum. 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: . Diabetes Care 2020;43(Suppl. 1):S111-S134. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(8):1977-1978. DOI: 10.2337/dc20-ad08. View

2.
Franchi F, Rollini F, Aggarwal N, Hu J, Kureti M, Durairaj A . Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease: The OPTIMUS (Optimizing Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus)-4 Study. Circulation. 2016; 134(11):780-92. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023402. View

3.
Crea F, Thiele H, Sibbing D, Barthelemy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt D . Debate: Prasugrel rather than ticagrelor is the preferred treatment for NSTE-ACS patients who proceed to PCI and pretreatment should not be performed in patients planned for an early invasive strategy. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(31):2973-2985. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab277. View

4.
Wallentin L, Becker R, Budaj A, Cannon C, Emanuelsson H, Held C . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(11):1045-57. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327. View

5.
Malinin A, Pokov A, Spergling M, DeFranco A, Schwartz K, Schwartz D . Monitoring platelet inhibition after clopidogrel with the VerifyNow-P2Y12(R) rapid analyzer: the VERIfy Thrombosis risk ASsessment (VERITAS) study. Thromb Res. 2006; 119(3):277-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.01.019. View