Robotic Mitral Valve Repair-the Bruxelles Experience

Overview

Journal Ann Cardiothorac Surg

Publisher AME Publishing Company

Date 2022 Dec 9

PMID 36483615

Authors

Gaby Aphram

Giovanni Melina

Philippe Noirhomme

Laurent de Kerchove

Stefano Mastrobuoni

Maureen Klepper

Gebrine El Khoury

Emiliano Navarra

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Although the use of the surgical robot facilitates less invasive mitral valve surgery, both real and perceived limitations have slowed the application of this technology. Aim of the present investigation was to report the early and long-term results of robotic mitral valve repair in a single institution over a 10-year period.

Methods: Between March 2012 and May 2022, a total of 278 consecutive patients underwent robotically assisted mitral valve repair at the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium). Indications have evolved over time allowing the treatment of complex mitral valve lesions. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were 97.8% and 86.1% complete, respectively.

Results: Mean age of the study population was 57.8±11.9 years and 221/278 (79.5%) patients were male. Despite being asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II], most of the patients presented with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Degenerative mitral valve disease was the most common cause of MR. All patients underwent successful mitral valve repair using different techniques, and 25/278 (9.0%) had one or more concomitant procedures associated. The mean cardio-pulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times were 153±37 and 106±25 minutes, respectively. There was no operative or in-hospital mortality. Overall survival rate was 97.8%±3.2%, 95.8%±3.2% and 93.7%±3.0% at 3, 7 and 10 years. One early (0.4%) reoperation with re-repair was recorded for ring disruption, while late mitral valve re-repair was necessary in 4/279 (1.4%) patients for recurrent severe MR in three of them and mitral endocarditis in one. The overall freedom from mitral valve reoperation was 98.1%±1.0% at 3, 7 and 10 years. Overall freedom from MR (grade 2+ or more) was 91.7%±3.2%, 77.8%±4.8% and 67.1%±9.2% at 3, 7 and 10 years, respectively.

Conclusions: Robotic mitral valve repair is safe and is associated with excellent clinical and echocardiographic results. The use of robotic technologies allows, after an appropriate learning curve, to reproduce all conventional techniques to treat MR, regardless of the complexity of the valve lesion.

Citing Articles

Robotically assisted mitral valve repair using the butterfly technique in a patient with a narrow chest.

Tatsuki S, Hashimoto M, Koshima R J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025; 20(1):6.

PMID: 39755667 PMC: 11699664. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-03275-9.

References

Nifong L, Rodriguez E, Chitwood Jr W . 540 consecutive robotic mitral valve repairs including concomitant atrial fibrillation cryoablation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 94(1):38-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.036. View

Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff H, Orszulak T, Tajik A, Bailey K, Frye R . Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation. 1995; 91(4):1022-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.4.1022. View

Dairywala M, Gupta S, Salna M, Nguyen T . Surgeon Strength: Ergonomics and Strength Training in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 34(4):1220-1229. DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.09.015. View

Casselman F, Van Slycke S, Wellens F, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Van Praet F . Mitral valve surgery can now routinely be performed endoscopically. Circulation. 2003; 108 Suppl 1:II48-54. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087391.49121.ce. View

Galloway A, Schwartz C, Ribakove G, Crooke G, Gogoladze G, Ursomanno P . A decade of minimally invasive mitral repair: long-term outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88(4):1180-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.023. View

Schmitto J, Mokashi S, Cohn L . Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(6):455-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.053. View

Seeburger J, Borger M, Falk V, Kuntze T, Czesla M, Walther T . Minimal invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation: results of 1339 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 34(4):760-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.015. View

Folliguet T, Vanhuyse F, Constantino X, Realli M, Laborde F . Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006; 29(3):362-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.12.004. View

Chitwood Jr W, Rodriguez E, Chu M, Hassan A, Ferguson T, Vos P . Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 136(2):436-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.03.053. View

10.

Pettinari M, Navarra E, Noirhomme P, Gutermann H . The state of robotic cardiac surgery in Europe. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 6(1):1-8. PMC: 5293627. DOI: 10.21037/acs.2017.01.02. View

11.

Gillinov A, Cosgrove D, Blackstone E, Diaz R, ARNOLD J, Lytle B . Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 116(5):734-43. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)00450-4. View

12.

Gillinov A, Mihaljevic T, Javadikasgari H, Suri R, Mick S, Navia J . Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: Analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 155(1):82-91.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.037. View

13.

Mihaljevic T, Jarrett C, Gillinov A, Williams S, DeVilliers P, Stewart W . Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: potential realized. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 141(1):72-80.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.008. View

14.

Cheng W, Fontana G, De Robertis M, Mirocha J, Czer L, Kass R . Is robotic mitral valve repair a reproducible approach?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 139(3):628-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.047. View

15.

Mohty D, Orszulak T, Schaff H, Avierinos J, Tajik J, Enriquez-Sarano M . Very long-term survival and durability of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse. Circulation. 2001; 104(12 Suppl 1):I1-I7. DOI: 10.1161/hc37t1.094903. View

16.

Akins C, Miller D, Turina M, Kouchoukos N, Blackstone E, Grunkemeier G . Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 33(4):523-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.055. View

17.

Suri R, Taggarse A, Burkhart H, Daly R, Mauermann W, Nishimura R . Robotic Mitral Valve Repair for Simple and Complex Degenerative Disease: Midterm Clinical and Echocardiographic Quality Outcomes. Circulation. 2015; 132(21):1961-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017792. View

18.

Klepper M, Noirhomme P, de Kerchove L, Mastrobuoni S, Spadaccio C, Lemaire G . Robotic mitral valve repair: A single center experience over a 7-year period. J Card Surg. 2022; 37(8):2266-2277. DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16575. View

19.

Grossi E, Galloway A, LaPietra A, Ribakove G, Ursomanno P, Delianides J . Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74(3):660-3; discussion 663-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03754-2. View

20.

Navarra E, Mastrobuoni S, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, Watremez C, Van Dyck M . Robotic mitral valve repair: a European single-centre experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017; 25(1):62-67. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivx060. View