» Articles » PMID: 36483379

Cost and Healthcare Utilization of Methicillin-resistant Bacteremia Estimated from Linked Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance and Hospital Claims Data in Japan

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the incremental costs and healthcare utilization of methicillin-resistant (MRSA) bacteremia with those of methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) bacteremia.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using data from April 2014 to March 2015.

Setting: Antimicrobial resistance surveillance and hospital claims data from 16 Japanese hospitals.

Patients: The study included 73 patients with bacteremia: 23 with MRSA and 50 with MSSA.

Methods: MRSA bacteremia was identified using blood cultures and drug-susceptibility tests. MRSA- and MSSA-related medical practices were evaluated. The costs were calculated and compared. All the medical costs were classified into empirical and definitive therapy periods and expressed in Japanese yen (JPY, 1 USD = 106 JPY). Additionally, costs at aggressive and passive bacterial test-performing facilities were compared.

Results: No significant differences existed in MRSA-related resource use per patient episode between MRSA and MSSA bacteremia during empirical therapy. However, during definitive therapy, in MRSA bacteremia compared with MSSA bacteremia, this difference was higher. The average MRSA-related costs of empirical therapy for MRSA and MSSA were 13,380 and 9,140 JPY (126 and 86 USD) per patient, and for definitive therapy, they were 69,810 and 29,510 JPY (659 and 278 USD) per patient, respectively. No significant differences were noted. Conversely, the average examination costs during definitive therapy differed significantly: 9,740 vs 3,850 JPY (92 vs 36 USD), respectively ( .0294). Furthermore, the incremental costs in aggressive facilities were lower for the definitive therapy period than those in passive facilities.

Conclusions: In the definitive therapy period, MRSA bacteremia had higher incremental costs and greater use of healthcare resources. In addition, the incremental costs in aggressive facilities were lower than those in passive facilities.

Citing Articles

Estimated medical costs of methicillin-resistant infection classified by polymerase chain reaction-based open reading frame typing in Japan.

Shoji T, Muto R, Sakai R, Matsumura H, Uchida T, Kitta F AIMS Microbiol. 2023; 8(4):528-543.

PMID: 36694583 PMC: 9834076. DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2022034.

References
1.
Cosgrove S, Sakoulas G, Perencevich E, Schwaber M, Karchmer A, Carmeli Y . Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 36(1):53-9. DOI: 10.1086/345476. View

2.
Rubio-Terres C, Garau J, Grau S, Martinez-Martinez L . Cost of bacteraemia caused by methicillin-resistant vs. methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009; 16(6):722-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02902.x. View

3.
McDanel J, Perencevich E, Diekema D, Herwaldt L, Smith T, Chrischilles E . Comparative effectiveness of beta-lactams versus vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections among 122 hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 61(3):361-7. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ308. View

4.
Mimura W, Fukuda H, Akazawa M . Antimicrobial utilization and antimicrobial resistance in patients with haematological malignancies in Japan: a multi-centre cross-sectional study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020; 19(1):7. PMC: 7027235. DOI: 10.1186/s12941-020-00348-0. View

5.
Seigel T, Cocchi M, Salciccioli J, Shapiro N, Howell M, Tang A . Inadequacy of temperature and white blood cell count in predicting bacteremia in patients with suspected infection. J Emerg Med. 2010; 42(3):254-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.05.038. View