Personal Responsibility for Health: Exploring Together with Lay Persons

Overview

Journal Public Health Ethics

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Public Health

Date 2022 Dec 9

PMID 36483293

Authors

Yukiko Asada

Marion Brown

Mary McNally

Andrea Murphy

Robin Urquhart

Grace Warner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Emerging parallel to long-standing, academic and policy inquiries on personal responsibility for health is the empirical assessment of lay persons' views. Yet, previous studies rarely explored personal responsibility for health among lay persons as dynamic societal values. We sought to explore lay persons' views on personal responsibility for health using the Fairness Dialogues, a method for lay persons to deliberate equity issues in health and health care through a small group dialogue using a hypothetical scenario. We conducted two 2-h Fairness Dialogues sessions ( = 15 in total) in Nova Scotia, Canada. We analyzed data using thematic analysis. Our analysis showed that personal choice played an important role in participants' thinking about health. Underlying the concept of personal choice was considerations of freedom and societal debt. In participants' minds, personal and social responsibilities co-existed and they were unwilling to determine health care priority based on personal responsibility. The Fairness Dialogues is a promising deliberative method to explore lay persons' views as dynamic values to be developed through group dialogues as opposed to static, already-formed values waiting to be elicited.

References

Schmidt H . Just health responsibility. J Med Ethics. 2008; 35(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.024315. View

Schmidt H . Personal responsibility in the NHS Constitution and the social determinants of health approach: competitive or complementary?. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009; 4(Pt 2):129-38. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133109004976. View

Traina G, Martinussen P, Feiring E . Being Healthy, Being Sick, Being Responsible: Attitudes towards Responsibility for Health in a Public Healthcare System. Public Health Ethics. 2019; 12(2):145-157. PMC: 6655377. DOI: 10.1093/phe/phz009. View

Gollust S, Lynch J . Who deserves health care? The effects of causal attributions and group cues on public attitudes about responsibility for health care costs. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011; 36(6):1061-95. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-1460578. View

Schmidt H, Voigt K, Wikler D . Carrots, sticks, and health care reform--problems with wellness incentives. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(2):e3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0911552. View

Blacksher E, Diebel A, Forest P, Goold S, Abelson J . What is public deliberation?. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012; 42(2):14-7. DOI: 10.1002/hast.26. View

Shah K, Cookson R, Culyer A, Littlejohns P . NICE's social value judgements about equity in health and health care. Health Econ Policy Law. 2012; 8(2):145-65. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133112000096. View

Wikler D . Personal and social responsibility for health. Ethics Int Aff. 2005; 16(2):47-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2002.tb00396.x. View

Booske B, Robert S, Rohan A . Awareness of racial and socioeconomic health disparities in the United States: the national opinion survey on health and health disparities, 2008-2009. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011; 8(4):A73. PMC: 3136972. View

10.

Crossley M . 'Would you consider yourself a healthy person?': using focus groups to explore health as a moral phenomenon. J Health Psychol. 2009; 8(5):501-14. DOI: 10.1177/13591053030085003. View

11.

Niederdeppe J, Shapiro M, Kim H, Bartolo D, Porticella N . Narrative persuasion, causality, complex integration, and support for obesity policy. Health Commun. 2013; 29(5):431-44. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2012.761805. View

12.

Niederdeppe J, Roh S, Shapiro M . Acknowledging individual responsibility while emphasizing social determinants in narratives to promote obesity-reducing public policy: a randomized experiment. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0117565. PMC: 4338108. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117565. View

13.

Gollust S, Lantz P, Ubel P . Images of illness: how causal claims and racial associations influence public preferences toward diabetes research spending. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011; 35(6):921-59. PMC: 3856194. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-2010-034. View

14.

Whitty J, Lancsar E, Rixon K, Golenko X, Ratcliffe J . A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting. Patient. 2014; 7(4):365-86. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0063-2. View

15.

Cookson R, Dolan P . Public views on health care rationing: a group discussion study. Health Policy. 2000; 49(1-2):63-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00043-3. View

16.

Lundell H, Niederdeppe J, Clarke C . Public views about health causation, attributions of responsibility, and inequality. J Health Commun. 2013; 18(9):1116-30. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.768724. View

17.

Marchildon G, Allin S, Merkur S . Canada: Health System Review. Health Syst Transit. 2021; 22(3):1-194. View

18.

Martin D, Miller A, Quesnel-Vallee A, Caron N, Vissandjee B, Marchildon G . Canada's universal health-care system: achieving its potential. Lancet. 2018; 391(10131):1718-1735. PMC: 7138369. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30181-8. View

19.

Curtin K, Thomson M, Nykiforuk C . Who or what is to blame? Examining sociodemographic relationships to beliefs about causes, control, and responsibility for cancer and chronic disease prevention in Alberta, Canada. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1047. PMC: 8173791. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11065-4. View

20.

Kawachi I, Subramanian S . A glossary for health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56(9):647-52. PMC: 1732240. DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.9.647. View