» Articles » PMID: 36483057

Salvage Involved-Field and Extended-Field Radiation Therapy in Positron Emission Tomography-Positive Nodal Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Outcomes and Patterns of Failure

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Dec 9
PMID 36483057
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The optimal salvage pelvic treatment for nodal recurrences in prostate cancer is not yet clearly defined. We aimed to compare outcomes of salvage involved-field radiation therapy (s-IFRT) and salvage extended-field radiation therapy (s-EFRT) for positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive nodal-recurrent prostate cancer and to analyze patterns of progressions after salvage nodal radiation therapy.

Methods And Materials: Patients with F-fluorocholine or Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive nodal-recurrent prostate cancer and treated with s-IFRT or s-EFRT were retrospectively selected. Time to biochemical failure, time to palliative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and distant metastasis-free survival were analyzed.

Results: Between 2009 and 2019, 86 patients were treated with salvage nodal radiation therapy: 38 with s-IFRT and 48 with s-EFRT. After a median follow-up of 41.9 months (5.4-122.1 months), 47 patients presented a further relapse: 31 after s-IFRT and 16 after s-EFRT, with only 1 in-field relapse. The median time to palliative ADT was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.3-93.5 months) in the s-IFRT group and not yet reached (95% CI, 40.3 months to not yet reached) in the s-EFRT group ( = .010). The 3-year biochemical failure-free rate was 70.2% (95% CI, 51.5%-82.9%) with s-IFRT and 73.9% (95% CI, 55.4%-85.7%) with s-EFRT ( = .657). The 3-year distant metastasis-free survival was 74.1% (95% CI, 56.0%-85.7%) with s-IFRT and 82.0% (95% CI, 63.0%-91.8%) with s-EFRT ( = .338).

Conclusions: s-EFRT and s-IFRT for positron emission tomography-positive nodal-recurrent prostate cancer provide excellent local control. Time to palliative ADT was longer following s-EFRT than following s-IFRT.

References
1.
Rischke H, Schultze-Seemann W, Wieser G, Kronig M, Drendel V, Stegmaier P . Adjuvant radiotherapy after salvage lymph node dissection because of nodal relapse of prostate cancer versus salvage lymph node dissection only. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014; 191(4):310-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0763-5. View

2.
Evangelista L, Briganti A, Fanti S, Joniau S, Reske S, Schiavina R . New Clinical Indications for (18)F/(11)C-choline, New Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography and a Promising Hybrid Device for Prostate Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(1):161-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.029. View

3.
Rouard N, Peiffert D, Rio E, Mahe M, Delpon G, Marchesi V . Intensity-modulated radiation therapy of anal squamous cell carcinoma: Relationship between delineation quality and regional recurrence. Radiother Oncol. 2019; 131:93-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.021. View

4.
Vaugier L, Palpacuer C, Rio E, Goineau A, Pasquier D, Buthaud X . Early Toxicity of a Phase 2 Trial of Combined Salvage Radiation Therapy and Hormone Therapy in Oligometastatic Pelvic Node Relapses of Prostate Cancer (OLIGOPELVIS GETUG P07). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 103(5):1061-1067. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.020. View

5.
Shipley W, Seiferheld W, Lukka H, Major P, Heney N, Grignon D . Radiation with or without Antiandrogen Therapy in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(5):417-428. PMC: 5444881. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607529. View