» Articles » PMID: 36482231

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Alfentanil in Gastroscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal J Anesth
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2022 Dec 9
PMID 36482231
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Propofol can be used alone or in combination with opioids during gastroscopy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol and different doses of alfentanil in patients undergoing gastroscopy.

Methods: A total of 300 patients undergoing sedative gastroscopy were randomly divided into four groups, and 0.9% saline (group A), 2 μg/kg alfentanil (group B), 3 μg/kg alfentanil (group C) or 4 μg/kg alfentanil (group D) were injected intravenously 1 min before the intravenous injection of 1.5 mg/kg propofol. If body movement and coughing occurred during the procedure, 0.5 mg/kg propofol would be administered intravenously. The primary outcome (awakening time) and secondary outcomes were recorded and analyzed, including hemodynamic changes, the incidences of body movement, coughing, hypoxemia, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, nausea and vomiting, drowsiness and dizziness.

Results: Patients in group C (7.0 [5.0 to 8.0] min) and group D (6.0 [5.0 to 7.0] min) woke up significantly earlier than those in group A (8.0 [6.0 to 10.0] min) (P < 0.001). Patients in group A experienced more body movement (P = 0.001) and coughing (P < 0.001) than the other groups. With the increasing dose of alfentanil, the morbidity of hypotension and bradycardia increased significantly (P = 0.001), while the incidence of dizziness decreased significantly (P = 0.037). The incidences of hypoxemia, tachycardia, drowsiness, nausea and vomiting were similar among the four groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Intravenous 1.5 mg/kg propofol combined with 3 μg/kg alfentanil is more suitable for patients undergoing gastroscopy, and the dose of alfentanil can be reduced according to the patient's actual physical condition.

Citing Articles

Effects of different doses of alfentanil combined with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy.

Deng S, Huang X, Lei X Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34161.

PMID: 39108900 PMC: 11301163. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34161.


Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Besylate versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Xu H, Wang L, Zhu W, Ren C, Liu G, Liu Y Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024; 18:2317-2327.

PMID: 38915861 PMC: 11194170. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S460949.


The median effective dose of propofol combined with butorphanol during artificial abortion: a randomized controlled trial.

Zheng Y, Huang J, Mai Y, Li X, Zhang Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1226495.

PMID: 38089879 PMC: 10711101. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1226495.


Modified Dixon sequential method to determine the effective dose of alfentanil compounded with propofol for day-case hysteroscopy.

Xu C, Peng R, Qian X, Feng S, Yuan H Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023; 14:20420986231214992.

PMID: 38074416 PMC: 10702409. DOI: 10.1177/20420986231214992.


The Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Combined with Esketamine for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Li W, Zhao J, Hao R, Wang S, Chen M, Liu H Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023; 17:2875-2887.

PMID: 37746114 PMC: 10516197. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S425860.

References
1.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel R, Torre L, Jemal A . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6):394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492. View

2.
Leung W, Wu M, Kakugawa Y, Kim J, Yeoh K, Goh K . Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9(3):279-87. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70072-X. View

3.
Teh J, Shabbir A, Yuen S, So J . Recent advances in diagnostic upper endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26(4):433-447. PMC: 7002908. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i4.433. View

4.
Abraham N, Fallone C, Mayrand S, Huang J, Wieczorek P, Barkun A . Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99(9):1692-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40157.x. View

5.
Men F, Wei L, Liu B, Wu F, Liu J, Guo N . Comparison of the safety of the application of painless gastroscopy and ordinary gastroscopy in chronic hypertension patients combined with early gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018; 15(3):3558-3561. PMC: 5795935. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.7737. View