» Articles » PMID: 36481679

Physical but Not Virtual Presence of Others Potentiates Implicit and Explicit Learning

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Dec 8
PMID 36481679
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

E-learning activities are becoming more and more common. Whilst it is well known that the physical presence of others motivates individuals to engage in perceptual and learning tasks, systematic investigations comparing the effects of physical and virtual co-presence of others on knowledge acquisition are still scarce. Here we investigate the effects of physical and virtual co-presence of others on explicit and implicit learning. In Experiment 1 (discovery sample), retrieval accuracy in a spatial memory task and EEG indexes (mismatch negativity-MMN) of implicit perceptual learning were recorded when participants were alone or in presence of another individual. In Experiment 2 (replicating sample), we added a "virtual" condition, where the same tasks were performed during a video-conference call. In both experiments, MMN was demonstrated to encode for perceptual learning as revealed by the significant correlation with Bayesian Surprise (a consolidated information-theoretic index of Bayesian learning). Furthermore, In Experiments 1 and 2 physical co-presence systematically ameliorated memorization performances and increased MMN indexes related to implicit learning. These positive effects were absent in the virtual condition, thus suggesting that only physical, but not virtual co-presence is effective in potentiating learning dynamics.

Citing Articles

Serious Game for the Nursing Assessment of Home-Dwelling Older Adults: Development and Validation Study.

Busca E, Caristia S, Bidone S, Bolamperti A, Campagna S, Cattaneo A JMIR Serious Games. 2024; 12:e52644.

PMID: 39591607 PMC: 11632285. DOI: 10.2196/52644.


Shared attention in virtual immersive reality enhances electrophysiological correlates of implicit sensory learning.

Sarasso P, Ronga I, Piovesan F, Barbieri P, Del Fante E, De Luca D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3767.

PMID: 38355691 PMC: 10866920. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53937-w.

References
1.
Auksztulewicz R, Friston K . Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 25(11):4273-83. PMC: 4816780. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu323. View

2.
Rosch R, Auksztulewicz R, Leung P, Friston K, Baldeweg T . Selective Prefrontal Disinhibition in a Roving Auditory Oddball Paradigm Under N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Blockade. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018; 4(2):140-150. PMC: 6374982. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.07.003. View

3.
Sarasso P, Neppi-Modona M, Rosaia N, Perna P, Barbieri P, Del Fante E . Nice and easy: Mismatch negativity responses reveal a significant correlation between aesthetic appreciation and perceptual learning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021; 151(6):1433-1445. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001149. View

4.
Garrido M, Kilner J, Stephan K, Friston K . The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(3):453-63. PMC: 2671031. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029. View

5.
Boothby E, Smith L, Clark M, Bargh J . Psychological Distance Moderates the Amplification of Shared Experience. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016; 42(10):1431-44. DOI: 10.1177/0146167216662869. View