» Articles » PMID: 36479243

Single-step Genomic BLUP with Many Metafounders

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2022 Dec 8
PMID 36479243
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) model for routine genomic prediction of breeding values is developed intensively for many dairy cattle populations. Compatibility between the genomic () and the pedigree () relationship matrices remains an important challenge required in ssGBLUP. The compatibility relates to the amount of missing pedigree information. There are two prevailing approaches to account for the incomplete pedigree information: unknown parent groups (UPG) and metafounders (MF). unknown parent groups have been used routinely in pedigree-based evaluations to account for the differences in genetic level between groups of animals with missing parents. The MF approach is an extension of the UPG approach. The MF approach defines MF which are related pseudo-individuals. The MF approach needs a matrix of the size number of MF to describe relationships between MF. The UPG and MF can be the same. However, the challenge in the MF approach is the estimation of having many MF, typically needed in dairy cattle. In our study, we present an approach to fit the same amount of MF as UPG in ssGBLUP with Woodbury matrix identity (ssGTBLUP). We used 305-day milk, protein, and fat yield data from the DFS (Denmark, Finland, Sweden) Red Dairy cattle population. The pedigree had more than 6 million animals of which 207,475 were genotyped. We constructed the preliminary gamma matrix ( ) with 29 MF which was expanded to 148 MF by a covariance function ( ). The quality of the extrapolation of the matrix was studied by comparing average off-diagonal elements between breed groups. On average relationships among MF in were 1.8% higher than in . The use of increased the correlation between the and matrices by 0.13 and 0.11 for the diagonal and off-diagonal elements, respectively. [G]EBV were predicted using the ssGTBLUP and Pedigree-BLUP models with the MF and UPG. The prediction reliabilities were slightly higher for the ssGTBLUP model using MF than UPG. The ssGBLUP MF model showed less overprediction compared to other models.

Citing Articles

Combined genomic evaluation of Merino and Dohne Merino Australian sheep populations.

Wicki M, Brown D, Gurman P, Raoul J, Legarra A, Swan A Genet Sel Evol. 2024; 56(1):69.

PMID: 39350072 PMC: 11440750. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00934-2.


Definition of metafounders based on population structure analysis.

Anglhuber C, Edel C, Pimentel E, Emmerling R, Gotz K, Thaller G Genet Sel Evol. 2024; 56(1):43.

PMID: 38844876 PMC: 11536677. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00913-7.


Strategies for genomic predictions of an indicine multi-breed population using single-step GBLUP.

Londono-Gil M, Lopez-Correa R, Aguilar I, Magnabosco C, Hidalgo J, Bussiman F J Anim Breed Genet. 2024; 142(1):43-56.

PMID: 38812461 PMC: 11629074. DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12882.


Estimating genomic relationships of metafounders across and within breeds using maximum likelihood, pseudo-expectation-maximization maximum likelihood and increase of relationships.

Legarra A, Bermann M, Mei Q, Christensen O Genet Sel Evol. 2024; 56(1):35.

PMID: 38698347 PMC: 11536831. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00892-9.

References
1.
Patry C, Ducrocq V . Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2011; 94(2):1011-20. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3804. View

2.
Mantysaari E, Evans R, Stranden I . Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals. J Anim Sci. 2018; 95(11):4728-4737. PMC: 6292282. DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1912. View

3.
Granado-Tajada I, Legarra A, Ugarte E . Exploring the inclusion of genomic information and metafounders in Latxa dairy sheep genetic evaluations. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 103(7):6346-6353. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-18033. View

4.
Vitezica Z, Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A . Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Genet Res (Camb). 2011; 93(5):357-66. DOI: 10.1017/S001667231100022X. View

5.
Pribyl J, Madsen P, Bauer J, Pribylova J, Simeckova M, Vostry L . Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production. J Dairy Sci. 2013; 96(3):1865-73. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6157. View