» Articles » PMID: 36478875

Facial Mask Disturbs Ocular Exploration but Not Pupil Reactivity

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2022 Dec 8
PMID 36478875
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed to wear a face mask that may have negative consequences for social interactions despite its health benefits. A lot of recent studies focused on emotion recognition of masked faces, as the mouth is, with the eyes, essential to convey emotional content. However, none have studied neurobehavioral and neurophysiological markers of masked faces perception, such as ocular exploration and pupil reactivity. The purpose of this eye tracking study was to quantify how wearing a facial accessory, and in particular a face mask, affected the ocular and pupillary response to a face, emotional or not.

Methods: We used videos of actors wearing a facial accessory to characterize the visual exploration and pupillary response in several occlusion (no accessory, sunglasses, scarf, and mask) and emotional conditions (neutral, happy, and sad) in a population of 44 adults.

Results: We showed that ocular exploration differed for face covered with an accessory, and in particular a mask, compared to the classical visual scanning pattern of a non-covered face. The covered areas of the face were less explored. Pupil reactivity seemed only slightly affected by the mask, while its sensitivity to emotions was observed even in the presence of a facial accessory.

Discussion: These results suggest a mixed impact of the mask on attentional capture and physiological adjustment, which does not seem to be reconcilable with its strong effect on behavioral emotional recognition previously described.

Citing Articles

Recognizing and Looking at Masked Emotional Faces in Alexithymia.

Fuchs M, Kersting A, Suslow T, Bodenschatz C Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38667139 PMC: 11047507. DOI: 10.3390/bs14040343.


Depressive symptoms and visual attention to others' eyes in healthy individuals.

Suslow T, Hoepfel D, Kersting A, Bodenschatz C BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):184.

PMID: 38448877 PMC: 10916197. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05633-2.

References
1.
Bradley M, Miccoli L, Escrig M, Lang P . The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology. 2008; 45(4):602-7. PMC: 3612940. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x. View

2.
Flechsenhar A, Gamer M . Top-down influence on gaze patterns in the presence of social features. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0183799. PMC: 5570331. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183799. View

3.
Noyes E, Davis J, Petrov N, Gray K, Ritchie K . The effect of face masks and sunglasses on identity and expression recognition with super-recognizers and typical observers. R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(3):201169. PMC: 8074904. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201169. View

4.
Kret M, de Gelder B . Islamic Headdress Influences How Emotion is Recognized from the Eyes. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:110. PMC: 3322610. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00110. View

5.
Carbon C . Wearing Face Masks Strongly Confuses Counterparts in Reading Emotions. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:566886. PMC: 7545827. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566886. View