» Articles » PMID: 36476072

'Madness' After the War in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Challenging Dominant Understandings of Distress

Overview
Journal Health (London)
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2022 Dec 8
PMID 36476072
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article reports on the findings from a small-scale co-produced qualitative study on experiences of distress caused by the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Inspired by the emerging interdisciplinary field of Mad Studies, the study is novel and unique in two ways. First, it prioritises social understanding and interpretation of madness and distress. Second, an emphasis is placed on experiential knowledge. Beyond interviews with 20 people who experienced distress due to political conflict, this included contextualisation of the study in the knowledge generated through survivor research and within the field of Mad Studies. Study findings highlight the social causes and consequences of distress caused by conflict, such as war-related violence, gender-based violence, experiences of poverty and corruption. Participants stressed the importance of safety and support within their own home, mutual and supportive relationships with their families, friends, other people who experienced distress, the broader community and opportunities to do everyday activities they enjoy. In terms of professional support, the findings suggest that poverty alleviation and protection of people's right to self-determination through access to human rights advocacy and representation may be as relevant as non-coercive community-based services. This indicates that support for distress caused by political conflict need not be different from any other support for people who experience distress. Emphasis should be placed on survivor-run initiatives and non-coercive, community-based support which addresses social causes of distress and enables people to exercise self-determination.

Citing Articles

Findings From the World Mental Health Surveys of Civil Violence Exposure and Its Association With Subsequent Onset and Persistence of Mental Disorders.

Axinn W, Bruffaerts R, Kessler T, Frounfelker R, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(6):e2318919.

PMID: 37338903 PMC: 10282884. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18919.

References
1.
Kucukalic A, Dzubur-Kulenovic A, Ceric I, Jacobsson L, Bravo-Mehmedbasic A, Priebe S . Regional collaboration in reconstruction of mental health services in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Psychiatr Serv. 2005; 56(11):1455-7. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.11.1455. View

2.
Faulkner A, Carr S, Gould D, Khisa C, Hafford-Letchfield T, Cohen R . 'Dignity and respect': An example of service user leadership and co-production in mental health research. Health Expect. 2019; 24 Suppl 1:10-19. PMC: 8137502. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12963. View

3.
Attanayake V, McKay R, Joffres M, Singh S, Burkle Jr F, Mills E . Prevalence of mental disorders among children exposed to war: a systematic review of 7,920 children. Med Confl Surviv. 2009; 25(1):4-19. DOI: 10.1080/13623690802568913. View

4.
Al-Tamimi S, Leavey G . Community-Based Interventions for the Treatment and Management of Conflict-Related Trauma in Low-Middle Income, Conflict-Affected Countries: a Realist Review. J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2022; 15(2):441-450. PMC: 9120315. DOI: 10.1007/s40653-021-00373-x. View

5.
Gillard S, Simons L, Turner K, Lucock M, Edwards C . Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22(8):1126-37. DOI: 10.1177/1049732312448541. View