» Articles » PMID: 36471305

Application of a New Body Surface-assisting Puncture Device in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2022 Dec 5
PMID 36471305
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate puncture and localization are critical for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgery. However, several punctures are often required, followed by X-ray fluoroscopy, which can increase surgical risk and complications. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a new body surface-assisting puncture device that can be used in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and to assess its clinical effectiveness.

Methods: Three hundred and forty-four patients were treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgery in the Spinal Surgery Department of Taian City Central Hospital, China, between January 2020 and February 2022. Of these, 162 patients (the locator group) were punctured using a body surface-assisting puncture device while and 182 patients (the control group) were punctured using the traditional blind puncture method. The number of punctures, radiation dose during X-ray fluoroscopy, operation time, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: The average number of punctures was 2.15 ± 1.10 in the locator group which was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.30 ± 1.74; P < 0.001). The average X-ray fluoroscopy radiation dose in the locator group was significantly lower at 2.34 ± 0.99 mGy, compared with 5.13 ± 1.29 mGy in the control group (P < 0.001). The mean operation time was also significantly less in locator group (47.06 ± 5.12 vs. 62.47 ± 5.44 min; P = 0.008). No significant differences in surgical complications were found between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The use of a new body surface-assisting puncture device in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgery can significantly reduce the number of punctures and X-ray fluoroscopy radiation dose, as well as shortening the operation time, without increasing surgical complications. This device is cheap, easy to operate, and suitable for all hospitals and spine surgeons, especially for small hospitals, with also no extra costs for patients.

Citing Articles

Utilization of a novel patient-specific 3D-printing template for percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Huang X, Luo Q, Liang C, Wang Y, Jia D, Li S Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1323262.

PMID: 38680448 PMC: 11047121. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1323262.

References
1.
Carragee E, Han M, Suen P, Kim D . Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(1):102-8. View

2.
Ahn Y . Endoscopic spine discectomy: indications and outcomes. Int Orthop. 2019; 43(4):909-916. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-04283-w. View

3.
Kanno H, Aizawa T, Hahimoto K, Itoi E . Minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: current concepts, surgical techniques, and outcomes. Int Orthop. 2019; 43(4):917-922. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4256-5. View

4.
Lv Z, Jin L, Wang K, Chen Z, Li F, Zhang Y . Comparison of Effects of PELD and Fenestration in the Treatment of Geriatric Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis. Clin Interv Aging. 2020; 14:2187-2194. PMC: 6924588. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S226295. View

5.
Feng W, Yang J, Wei D, Gong H, Xi Y, Lv H . Gradient local anesthesia for percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy at the L5/S1 level: a feasibility study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1):413. PMC: 7493882. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01939-5. View