» Articles » PMID: 36470469

A Microfluidic Perspective on Conventional in Vitro Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Methods

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Dec 5
PMID 36470469
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation method to treat neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, its underlying neural mechanisms warrant further investigation. Indeed, dose-response interrelations are poorly understood. Placing explanted brain tissue, mostly from mice or rats, into a uniform direct current electric field (dcEF) is a well-established in vitro system to elucidate the neural mechanism of tDCS. Nevertheless, we will show that generating a defined, uniform, and constant dcEF throughout a brain slice is challenging. This article critically reviews the methods used to generate and calibrate a uniform dcEF. We use finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the widely used parallel electrode configuration and show that it may not reliably generate uniform dcEF within a brain slice inside an open interface or submerged chamber. Moreover, equivalent circuit analysis and measurements inside a testing chamber suggest that calibrating the dcEF intensity with two recording electrodes can inaccurately capture the true EF magnitude in the targeted tissue when specific criteria are not met. Finally, we outline why microfluidic chambers are an effective and calibration-free approach of generating spatiotemporally uniform dcEF for DCS in vitro studies, facilitating accurate and fine-scale dcEF adjustments. We are convinced that improving the precision and addressing the limitations of current experimental platforms will substantially improve the reproducibility of in vitro experimental results. A better mechanistic understanding of dose-response relations will ultimately facilitate more effective non-invasive stimulation therapies in patients.

Citing Articles

How conductivity boundaries influence the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in in vitro experiments.

Sundaram P, Dong C, Makaroff S, Okada Y Brain Stimul. 2024; 17(5):1034-1044.

PMID: 39142380 PMC: 11586064. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.08.003.


Bioelectronic Direct Current Stimulation at the Transition Between Reversible and Irreversible Charge Transfer.

Matter L, Abdullaeva O, Shaner S, Leal J, Asplund M Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(27):e2306244.

PMID: 38460180 PMC: 11251568. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202306244.


Brain stimulation-on-a-chip: a neuromodulation platform for brain slices.

Shaner S, Lu H, Lenz M, Garg S, Vlachos A, Asplund M Lab Chip. 2023; 23(23):4967-4985.

PMID: 37909911 PMC: 10661668. DOI: 10.1039/d3lc00492a.


Generation of direct current electrical fields as regenerative therapy for spinal cord injury: A review.

Matter L, Harland B, Raos B, Svirskis D, Asplund M APL Bioeng. 2023; 7(3):031505.

PMID: 37736015 PMC: 10511262. DOI: 10.1063/5.0152669.

References
1.
Doi K, Asano N, Kawano S . Development of glass micro-electrodes for local electric field, electrical conductivity, and pH measurements. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):4110. PMC: 7058011. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60713-z. View

2.
Valdes-Cruz A, Villasana-Salazar B, Williams B, Martinez-Vargas D, Magdaleno-Madrigal V, Almazan-Alvarado S . Transcranial focal electrical stimulation via concentric ring electrodes in freely moving cats: Antiepileptogenic and postictal effects. Exp Neurol. 2019; 320:113012. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113012. View

3.
Cogan S . Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008; 10:275-309. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160518. View

4.
Radman T, Datta A, Ramos R, Brumberg J, Bikson M . One-dimensional representation of a neuron in a uniform electric field. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009:6481-4. PMC: 2849761. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333586. View

5.
Merrill D, Bikson M, Jefferys J . Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 141(2):171-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020. View