Rodent Peri-implantitis Models: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Morphological Changes
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: Rodent models have emerged as an alternative to established larger animal models for peri-implantitis research. However, the construct validity of rodent models is controversial due to a lack of consensus regarding their histological, morphological, and biochemical characteristics. This systematic review sought to validate rodent models by characterizing their morphological changes, particularly marginal bone loss (MBL), a hallmark of peri-implantitis.
Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed electronically using MEDLINE (PubMed), and Embase, identifying pre-clinical studies reporting MBL after experimental peri-implantitis induction in rodents. Each study's risk of bias was assessed using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed for the difference in MBL, comparing healthy implants to those with experimental peri-implantitis.
Results: Of the 1,014 unique records retrieved, 23 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Peri-implantitis was induced using 4 methods: ligatures, lipopolysaccharide, microbial infection, and titanium particles. Studies presented high to unclear risks of bias. During the osseointegration phase, 11.6% and 6.4%-11.3% of implants inserted in mice and rats, respectively, had failed to osseointegrate. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis of the linear MBL measured using micro-computed tomography. Following experimental peri-implantitis, the MBL was estimated to be 0.25 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.36 mm) in mice and 0.26 mm (95% CI, 0.19-0.34 mm) in rats. The resulting peri-implant MBL was circumferential, consisting of supra- and infrabony components.
Conclusions: Experimental peri-implantitis in rodent models results in circumferential MBL, with morphology consistent with the clinical presentation of peri-implantitis. While rodent models are promising, there is still a need to further characterize their healing potentials, standardize experiment protocols, and improve the reporting of results and methodology.
Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020209776.
Wang J, Lin J, Song X, Wang M, Chen Y, Luo N Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1387633.
PMID: 39086935 PMC: 11289322. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1387633.
Induction of Experimental Peri-Implantitis with Strains Selected from the Human Oral Microbiome.
Ancuta D, Alexandru D, Crivineanu M, Coman C Biomedicines. 2024; 12(4).
PMID: 38672071 PMC: 11048198. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040715.
Panes C, Valdivia-Gandur I, Veuthey C, Sousa V, Del Sol M, Beltran V Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(4).
PMID: 38671818 PMC: 11048142. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11040397.
Peri-implantitis with a potential axis to brain inflammation: an inferential review.
Tessarin G, Toro L, Pereira R, Dos Santos R, Azevedo R Odontology. 2024; 112(4):1033-1046.
PMID: 38630323 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-00936-y.
The clinical effect of sodium hypochlorite oral rinse on peri-implantitis lesion: A pilot study.
Lee W, Park J Heliyon. 2023; 9(5):e15859.
PMID: 37305462 PMC: 10256906. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15859.