» Articles » PMID: 36467329

Female Squirrel Monkeys' () Responses to Inequity in a Group Context; Testing a Link Between Cooperation and Inequity Responses

Overview
Journal Anim Behav
Date 2022 Dec 5
PMID 36467329
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Primates of several species respond negatively to receiving less preferred rewards than a partner for completing the same task (inequity responses), either rejecting rewards or refusing to participate in the task when disadvantaged. This has been linked to cooperation, with species that cooperate frequently refusing to participate in inequity tasks (the 'cooperation hypothesis'). However, inequity is a social response, and previous research has involved dyads, precluding studying the effects of additional social partners. While dyads allow for tighter control in experimental settings, dyadic interactions in nature do not take place in a social vacuum, so understanding the role of the social context is needed to verify that the pattern of results supports the cooperation hypothesis. Here we focus on Bolivian squirrel monkeys, , a highly social species that does not generally cooperate and has not responded to inequity in previous dyadic research, although they do respond to receiving a lower reward than they expected. In the current study, we provide a more nuanced test by studying female Bolivian squirrel monkeys, the demographic most likely to cooperate in both field and laboratory contexts, in a more socially relevant group setting. For some reward values, females responded in both the inequity condition, rejecting less preferred rewards when they were disadvantaged relative to their social group, and a contrast condition, wherein all animals received a lower reward than they expected, making it difficult to disentangle contrast from inequity. As in capuchin monkeys, refusals increased when monkeys were to receive low-value rewards compared to medium-value rewards. These results suggest that the relationship between cooperation and inequity responses may be more nuanced than previously suggested, with demographic, social context and reward value potentially influencing outcomes even within species.

Citing Articles

No evidence for inequity aversion in non-human animals: a meta-analysis of accept/reject paradigms.

Ritov O, Volter C, Raihani N, Engelmann J Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2035):20241452.

PMID: 39591994 PMC: 11597404. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1452.


Conserved and differing functions of the endocrine system across different social systems - oxytocin as a case study.

Sosnowski M, Brosnan S Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1418089.

PMID: 39055053 PMC: 11269223. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1418089.


Comparative economics: how studying other primates helps us better understand the evolution of our own economic decision making.

Brosnan S, Wilson B Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1876):20210497.

PMID: 36934757 PMC: 10024989. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0497.

References
1.
Bard K, Hopkins W . Early Socioemotional Intervention Mediates Long-Term Effects of Atypical Rearing on Structural Covariation in Gray Matter in Adult Chimpanzees. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(4):594-603. PMC: 5902648. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617740685. View

2.
Brosnan S, Freeman C, de Waal F . Partner's behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys. Am J Primatol. 2006; 68(7):713-24. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20261. View

3.
Hopper L, Lambeth S, Schapiro S, Brosnan S . Social comparison mediates chimpanzees' responses to loss, not frustration. Anim Cogn. 2014; 17(6):1303-11. PMC: 4676562. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0765-9. View

4.
Brucks D, Range F, Marshall-Pescini S . Dogs' reaction to inequity is affected by inhibitory control. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):15802. PMC: 5694007. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16087-w. View

5.
Brosnan S, Talbot C, Ahlgren M, Lambeth S, Schapiro S . Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, . Anim Behav. 2016; 79(6):1229-1237. PMC: 4801319. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019. View