» Articles » PMID: 36467176

Assessment of Acute and Non-acute Suicide Crisis Symptoms: Validation of the Korean Version of the Acute Suicidal Affective Disturbance Inventory

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 Dec 5
PMID 36467176
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Suicide risk assessment is predominantly based on assessing current/recent suicidal ideation and past suicidal behavior. However, suicidal ideation and lifetime suicide attempt are poor predictors of imminent suicide risk or crisis. The acute suicidal affective disturbance inventory-lifetime (ASADI-L) was developed to assess symptoms of acute suicidal affective disturbance, which includes a drastic increase in suicidal intent, perceptions of social and/or self-alienation, hopelessness, and overarousal. However, the ASADI-L has not yet been validated in a Korean population. Also, the ASADI-L has only been validated for people who experience a drastic increase in suicidal intention over the course of hours or days (i.e., the acute suicidal intention group) and not validated for those who experience suicidal intention for a longer period (i.e., the non-acute suicidal intention group). Thus, the aims of this study were to (1) validate the ASADI-L in a sample of Korean community adults; and (2) compare clinical characteristics of the acute and non-acute suicidal intention groups. Among 1,675 community adults, data from 682 participants who reported a lifetime drastic increase in suicidal intent were analyzed. Results indicated that the ASADI-L has relevant reliability, validity, and a unidimensional factor structure. The acute suicidal intention group had higher ASAD symptoms as well as clinical symptoms than the non-acute group, but the two groups did not differ in history of suicide attempt. Overall, these findings suggest that the ASADI-L is a valid measure of acute and non-acute suicidal affective disturbance among Korean adults. Further investigation of the differences in acute and non-acute suicide risk is warranted.

References
1.
Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Lowe B . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(10):1092-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. View

2.
Posner K, Brown G, Stanley B, Brent D, Yershova K, Oquendo M . The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011; 168(12):1266-77. PMC: 3893686. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704. View

3.
Stanley I, Rufino K, Rogers M, Ellis T, Joiner T . Acute Suicidal Affective Disturbance (ASAD): A confirmatory factor analysis with 1442 psychiatric inpatients. J Psychiatr Res. 2016; 80:97-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.012. View

4.
Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J . Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999; 282(18):1737-44. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737. View

5.
Rogers M, Chu C, Joiner T . The necessity, validity, and clinical utility of a new diagnostic entity: Acute suicidal affective disturbance. J Clin Psychol. 2019; 75(6):999-1010. PMC: 6513685. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22743. View