» Articles » PMID: 36465464

Single-branched Stent-graft with On-table Fenestration for Endovascular Repair of Primary Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a single-branched stent-graft with on-table fenestration for primary retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Materials And Methods: From January 2019 to December 2021, 36 patients with primary RTAD from five tertiary hospitals received medical management in the acute phase. They underwent TEVAR with a proximal zone 1 landing for aortic arch reconstruction in the subacute phase, using a fenestration technique on a single-branched stent-graft. Nearly 2 weeks after admission, computed tomography angiography (CTA) was re-examined to evaluate the thrombosis status of retrograde false lumen (FL). The primary outcomes were technical success, patency of the target branch arteries, and absence of type Ia endoleaks. The second outcomes were stent-graft-related complications and all-cause mortality.

Results: The mean age was 56.2 ± 11.3 years, and 29 (80.6%) were male. After a median interval of 18.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 17.0-20.3] days of medical treatment, the partial and complete thrombosis of proximal FL rates increased to 52.8% and 47.2%, respectively. One patient (2.8%) experienced postoperative type Ia endoleaks, and was successfully re-treated using coli and Onyx glue. The median hospital stay was 20.5 (IQR, 18.0-23.0) days. The overall technical success rate was 100%. The median follow-up time was 31.5 (IQR, 29.8-34.0) months. There was one death (2.8%) due to gastrointestinal bleeding. Distal aortic segmental enlargement (DASE) occurred in two (5.6%) patients. No major complications or recurrent dissections in the proximal landing zone were recorded during follow up.

Conclusion: The retrograde FL in primary RTAD could realize partial or complete thrombosis after medical management in the acute phase, and it might be regarded as a valid proximal landing zone for endovascular repair. The single-branched stent graft with on-table fenestration performed in the subacute phase may be feasible strategy in selective primary RTAD patients.

Citing Articles

In situ fenestration (ISF) versus single-branched stent graft (SBSG) implantation in the management of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery.

Li Y, Zhao Y, Li R, Li Y, Liu Y, Li G Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(9):6792-6805.

PMID: 39281131 PMC: 11400708. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1705.

References
1.
Chen Y, Yen H, Lo C, Wu C, Huang D, Sheu J . Natural courses and long-term results of type A acute aortic intramural haematoma and retrograde thrombosed type A acute aortic dissection: a single-centre experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019; 30(1):113-120. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivz222. View

2.
Liu J, Yan C, Li L, Feng H, Xie S, Zhang G . Extended Stent Coverage Decreases Distal Aortic Segmental Enlargement After the Endovascular Repair of Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study of 814 Patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2021; 29(1):96-108. DOI: 10.1177/15266028211036479. View

3.
Yip H, Chan Y, Qing K, Cheng S . Retrograde type A dissection following hybrid supra-aortic endovascular surgery in high-risk patients unfit for conventional open repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015; 59(2):243-251. DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.08869-8. View

4.
Kato N, Shimono T, Hirano T, Ishida M, Yada I, Takeda K . Transluminal placement of endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of type A aortic dissection with an entry tear in the descending thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 34(6):1023-8. DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.118808. View

5.
Li Z, Wang X, He Y, Xiang Y, Wu Z, Zhang H . Long-Term Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Dissections. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:819501. PMC: 9005851. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.819501. View