» Articles » PMID: 36465339

Comparison of General Anesthesia and Continuous Intravenous Sedation for Electrochemotherapy of Head and Neck Skin Lesions

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Dec 5
PMID 36465339
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Electrochemotherapy of cutaneous tumor nodules requires local or general anesthesia. For multiple and larger nodules, general anesthesia is recommended by standard operating procedures. The choice of general anesthesia is at the discretion of the treating center. Continuous intravenous sedation is also an option. Our study aimed to elucidate the tolerability, safety and possible advantages of continuous intravenous sedation in comparison to general anesthesia in patients undergoing electrochemotherapy.

Patients And Methods: In the prospective study, 27 patients undergoing electrochemotherapy were either under general anesthesia or under continuous intravenous sedation. Evaluated were different endpoints, such as feasibility and safety, duration of anesthesia and compliance with the patients.

Results: Ten patients were treated under general anesthesia, and 17 patients were under continuous intravenous sedation. The comparison of the approaches indicated that continuous intravenous sedation required a lower overall dosage of propofol, a shorter duration of anesthesia, a shorter time to reach an Aldrete score >8, and greater satisfaction of the patients with the procedure compared to general anesthesia.

Conclusion: The results indicate the feasibility and safety of continuous intravenous sedation for patients undergoing electrochemotherapy of cutaneous tumor nodules. This proved the preferred choice of anesthesia due to its shorter duration and better compliance with the patients compared to general anesthesia.

Citing Articles

Reversible electroporation for cancer therapy.

Shiwani T, Singh Dhesi S, Dhesi S, Wah T Br J Radiol. 2024; 98(1167):313-320.

PMID: 39579146 PMC: 11840168. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae231.


The role of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced or recurrent eyelid-periocular basal cell carcinoma: long-term results.

Vass A, Polgar N, Sandor S, Agoston D, Rozsa P, Csanyi I Int J Dermatol. 2024; 64(1):111-118.

PMID: 38924059 PMC: 11685057. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.17346.


Treatment of vulvar cancer recurrence with electrochemotherapy: a case-control study.

Vivod G, Omerzel M, Kovacevic N, Gasljevic G, Cilensek I, Sersa G Acta Oncol. 2024; 63:351-357.

PMID: 38770722 PMC: 11332505. DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.33241.


Bleomycin electrosclerotherapy (BEST) for the treatment of vascular malformations. An International Network for Sharing Practices on Electrochemotherapy (InspECT) study group report.

Muir T, Bertino G, Groselj A, Ratnam L, Kis E, Odili J Radiol Oncol. 2023; 57(2):141-149.

PMID: 37341196 PMC: 10286891. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0029.

References
1.
Fahy B, Chau D . The Technology of Processed Electroencephalogram Monitoring Devices for Assessment of Depth of Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2017; 126(1):111-117. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002331. View

2.
Trotovsek B, Djokic M, Cemazar M, Sersa G . New era of electrochemotherapy in treatment of liver tumors in conjunction with immunotherapies. World J Gastroenterol. 2022; 27(48):8216-8226. PMC: 8717013. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i48.8216. View

3.
Giordano D, Raso M, Pernice C, Agnoletti V, Barbieri V . Topical local anesthesia: focus on lidocaine-tetracaine combination. Local Reg Anesth. 2015; 8:95-100. PMC: 4669927. DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S41836. View

4.
Gehl J, Sersa G, Matthiessen L, Muir T, Soden D, Occhini A . Updated standard operating procedures for electrochemotherapy of cutaneous tumours and skin metastases. Acta Oncol. 2018; 57(7):874-882. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1454602. View

5.
Aubrun F . Management of postoperative analgesia in elderly patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005; 30(4):363-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.02.006. View