» Articles » PMID: 36459511

Luminance Effects on Pupil Dilation in Speech-in-noise Recognition

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Dec 2
PMID 36459511
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is an increasing interest in the field of audiology and speech communication to measure the effort that it takes to listen in noisy environments, with obvious implications for populations suffering from hearing loss. Pupillometry offers one avenue to make progress in this enterprise but important methodological questions remain to be addressed before such tools can serve practical applications. Typically, cocktail-party situations may occur in less-than-ideal lighting conditions, e.g. a pub or a restaurant, and it is unclear how robust pupil dynamics are to luminance changes. In this study, we first used a well-known paradigm where sentences were presented at different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), all conducive of good intelligibility. This enabled us to replicate findings, e.g. a larger and later peak pupil dilation (PPD) at adverse SNR, or when the sentences were misunderstood, and to investigate the dependency of the PPD on sentence duration. A second experiment reiterated two of the SNR levels, 0 and +14 dB, but measured at 0, 75, and 220 lux. The results showed that the impact of luminance on the SNR effect was non-monotonic (sub-optimal in darkness or in bright light), and as such, there is no trivial way to derive pupillary metrics that are robust to differences in background light, posing considerable constraints for applications of pupillometry in daily life. Our findings raise an under-examined but crucial issue when designing and understanding listening effort studies using pupillometry, and offer important insights to future clinical application of pupillometry across sites.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Performance for Cochlear-Implant Listeners Using Audio Processing Strategies Based on Short-Time Fast Fourier Transform or Spectral Feature Extraction.

Zhang Y, Johannesen P, Molaee-Ardekani B, Wijetillake A, Attili Chiea R, Hasan P Ear Hear. 2024; 46(1):163-183.

PMID: 39680489 PMC: 11637581. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001565.


Pupillometry reveals effects of pitch manipulation within and across words on listening effort and short-term memory.

Zhang Y, Sares A, Delage A, Lehmann A, Deroche M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22595.

PMID: 39349635 PMC: 11442447. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73320-z.


Pupillometry as a biomarker of postural control: Deep-learning models reveal side-specific pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance tasks.

Rosker J, Leskovec T, Tomazin K, Majcen Rosker Z Psychophysiology. 2024; 61(12):e14667.

PMID: 39135357 PMC: 11579225. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14667.


Impact of SNR, peripheral auditory sensitivity, and central cognitive profile on the psychometric relation between pupillary response and speech performance in CI users.

Zhang Y, Callejon-Leblic M, Picazo-Reina A, Blanco-Trejo S, Patou F, Sanchez-Gomez S Front Neurosci. 2024; 17:1307777.

PMID: 38188029 PMC: 10768066. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1307777.


Phonological discrimination and contrast detection in pupillometry.

Chiossi J, Patou F, Ng E, Faulkner K, Lyxell B Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1232262.

PMID: 38023001 PMC: 10646334. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232262.


References
1.
Winn M, Moore A . Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518808962. PMC: 6207967. DOI: 10.1177/2331216518808962. View

2.
Wang Y, Zekveld A, Wendt D, Lunner T, Naylor G, Kramer S . Pupil light reflex evoked by light-emitting diode and computer screen: Methodology and association with need for recovery in daily life. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0197739. PMC: 5999086. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197739. View

3.
Tryon W . Pupillometry: a survey of sources of variation. Psychophysiology. 1975; 12(1):90-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03068.x. View

4.
Burg E, Thakkar T, Fields T, Misurelli S, Kuchinsky S, Roche J . Systematic Comparison of Trial Exclusion Criteria for Pupillometry Data Analysis in Individuals With Single-Sided Deafness and Normal Hearing. Trends Hear. 2021; 25:23312165211013256. PMC: 8150669. DOI: 10.1177/23312165211013256. View

5.
Pan J, Klimova M, McGuire J, Ling S . Arousal-based pupil modulation is dictated by luminance. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):1390. PMC: 8792027. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05280-1. View