Validating Emergency Department Cardioversion Procedures in Provincial Administrative Data in Ontario, Canada

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2022 Dec 1

PMID 36454739

Authors

Clare L Atzema

Ian G Stiell

Alice S Chong

Peter C Austin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Cardioversion of acute-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) via electrical or pharmacological means is a common procedure performed in many emergency departments. While these procedures appear to be very safe, the rarity of subsequent adverse outcomes such as stroke would require huge sample sizes to confirm that conclusion. Big data can supply such sample sizes.

Objective: We aimed to validate several potential codes for successful emergency department cardioversion of AF patients.

Methods: This study combined 3 observational datasets of emergency department AF visits seen at one of 26 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 2008 and 2012. We linked patients who were eligible for emergency department cardioversion to several province-wide health administrative datasets to search for the associated cardioversion billing and procedural codes. Using the observational data as the gold standard for successful cardioversion, we calculated the test characteristics of a billing code (Z437) and of procedural codes 1.HZ.09JAFS and 1.HZ.09JAJS. Both include pharmacological and electrical cardioversions, as well as unsuccessful attempts; the latter is <10% using electricity (in Canada, standard practice is to proceed to electrical cardioversion if pharmacological cardioversion is unsuccessful).

Results: Of 4557 unique patients in the three datasets, 2055 (45.1%) were eligible for cardioversion. Nine hundred thirty-three (45.4%) of these were successfully cardioverted to normal sinus rhythm. The billing code had slightly better test characteristics overall than the procedural codes. Positive predictive value (PPV) of a billing was 89.8% (95% CI, 87.0-92.2), negative predictive value (NPV) 70.5% (95% CI, 68.1-72.8), sensitivity 52.1% (95% CI, 48.8-55.3), and specificity 95.1% (95% CI, 93.7-96.3).

Conclusions: AF patients who have been successfully cardioverted in an emergency department can be identified with high PPV and specificity using a billing code. Studies that require high sensitivity for cardioversion should consider other methods to identify cardioverted patients.

References

Oral H, Souza J, Michaud G, Knight B, Goyal R, Strickberger S . Facilitating transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with ibutilide pretreatment. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(24):1849-54. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199906173402401. View

January C, Samuel Wann L, Calkins H, Chen L, Cigarroa J, Cleveland Jr J . 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(1):104-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. View

Andrade J, Mitchell L . Periprocedural Anticoagulation for Cardioversion of Acute Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter: Evidence Base for Current Guidelines. Can J Cardiol. 2019; 35(10):1301-1310. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.06.006. View

Stiell I, Clement C, Rowe B, Brison R, Wyse D, Birnie D . Outcomes for Emergency Department Patients With Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated in Canadian Hospitals. Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 69(5):562-571.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.013. View

Hall R, Mondor L, Porter J, Fang J, Kapral M . Accuracy of Administrative Data for the Coding of Acute Stroke and TIAs. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016; 43(6):765-773. DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2016.278. View

Airaksinen K, Gronberg T, Nuotio I, Nikkinen M, Ylitalo A, Biancari F . Thromboembolic complications after cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation: the FinCV (Finnish CardioVersion) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(13):1187-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.089. View

Borgundvaag B, Ovens H . Cardioversion of uncomplicated paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a survey of practice by Canadian emergency physicians. CJEM. 2007; 6(3):155-60. DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500006849. View

Stiell I, Clement C, Symington C, Perry J, Vaillancourt C, Wells G . Emergency department use of intravenous procainamide for patients with acute atrial fibrillation or flutter. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14(12):1158-64. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.016. View

Stiell I, Clement C, Perry J, Vaillancourt C, Symington C, Dickinson G . Association of the Ottawa Aggressive Protocol with rapid discharge of emergency department patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter. CJEM. 2010; 12(3):181-91. DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500012227. View

10.

Chugh S, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin E . Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2013; 129(8):837-47. PMC: 4151302. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119. View

11.

Naccarelli G, Varker H, Lin J, Schulman K . Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 104(11):1534-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.022. View

12.

Stiell I, McMurtry M, McRae A, Parkash R, Scheuermeyer F, Atzema C . Safe Cardioversion for Patients With Acute-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter: Practical Concerns and Considerations. Can J Cardiol. 2019; 35(10):1296-1300. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.06.007. View

13.

Singh S, Webster L, Calzavara A, Wijeysundera H . Validation of Algorithms to Identify Invasive Electrophysiology Procedures Using Administrative Data in Ontario, Canada. Med Care. 2014; 55(6):e44-e50. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000274. View

14.

Stiell I, de Wit K, Scheuermeyer F, Vadeboncoeur A, Angaran P, Eagles D . 2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist. CJEM. 2021; 23(5):604-610. PMC: 8423652. DOI: 10.1007/s43678-021-00167-y. View

15.

Yao R, Andrade J, Deyell M, Jackson H, McAlister F, Hawkins N . Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of identifying atrial fibrillation using administrative data: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 11:753-767. PMC: 6712502. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S206267. View

16.

Crijns H, Weijs B, Fairley A, Lewalter T, Maggioni A, Martin A . Contemporary real life cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Results from the multinational RHYTHM-AF study. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 172(3):588-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.01.099. View

17.

Go A, Hylek E, Phillips K, Chang Y, Henault L, Selby J . Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001; 285(18):2370-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370. View

18.

Stiell I, Clement C, Brison R, Rowe B, Borgundvaag B, Langhan T . Variation in management of recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter among academic hospital emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 57(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.07.005. View

19.

Andrade J, Aguilar M, Atzema C, Bell A, Cairns J, Cheung C . The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2020; 36(12):1847-1948. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.09.001. View

20.

Atzema C, Dorian P, Fang J, Tu J, Lee D, Chong A . A Clinical Decision Instrument for 30-Day Death After an Emergency Department Visit for Atrial Fibrillation: The Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Room (AFTER) Study. Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 66(6):658-668.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.07.017. View