» Articles » PMID: 36454326

Reporting Quality of Interventions Using a Wearable Activity Tracker to Improve Physical Activity in Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Rheumatol Int
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2022 Dec 1
PMID 36454326
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To assess the reporting quality of interventions aiming at promoting physical activity (PA) using a wearable activity tracker (WAT) in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) or hip/knee osteoarthritis (OA). A systematic search was performed in eight databases (including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library) for studies published between 2000 and 2022. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics and the reporting of the PA intervention using a WAT using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) (12 items) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) E-Health checklist (16 items). The reporting quality of each study was expressed as a percentage of reported items of the total CERT and CONSORT E-Health (50% or less = poor; 51-79% = moderate; and 80-100% = good reporting quality). Sixteen studies were included; three involved patients with IA and 13 with OA. Reporting quality was poor in 6/16 studies and moderate in 10/16 studies, according to the CERT and poor in 8/16 and moderate in 8/16 studies following the CONSORT E-Health checklist. Poorly reported checklist items included: the description of decision rule(s) for determining progression and the starting level, the number of adverse events and how adherence or fidelity was assessed. In clinical trials on PA interventions using a WAT in patients with IA or OA, the reporting quality of delivery process is moderate to poor. The poor reporting quality of the progression and tailoring of the PA programs makes replication difficult. Improvements in reporting quality are necessary.

References
1.
Fransen M, McConnell S, Hernandez-Molina G, Reichenbach S . Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (4):CD007912. PMC: 10898220. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007912.pub2. View

2.
Ostlind E, SantAnna A, Eek F, Stigmar K, Ekvall Hansson E . Physical activity patterns, adherence to using a wearable activity tracker during a 12-week period and correlation between self-reported function and physical activity in working age individuals with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):450. PMC: 8126142. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04338-x. View

3.
Sieper J, Poddubnyy D . Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet. 2017; 390(10089):73-84. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31591-4. View

4.
de Vries H, Kooiman T, van Ittersum M, van Brussel M, de Groot M . Do activity monitors increase physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016; 24(10):2078-91. DOI: 10.1002/oby.21619. View

5.
Qaseem A, Wilt T, McLean R, Forciea M, Denberg T, Barry M . Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017; 166(7):514-530. DOI: 10.7326/M16-2367. View