» Articles » PMID: 36452624

Stapler Assisted Total Laryngectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Dec 1
PMID 36452624
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Closure of the pharyngeal defect after total laryngectomy had been traditionally performed with manual suturing techniques that invert the mucosal edge this technique though effective, yet it is time-consuming. Recently the use of stapling devices to successfully close the pharyngeal defect after total laryngectomy has been advocated to shorten the operative time, especially in the high-risk cancer patients where a prolonged operative time is not preferred. The present study aimed at comparing stapler assisted total laryngectomy to suture closure total laryngectomy in a prospective randomized manner. This is a prospective clinical study conducted on 60 patients undergoing total laryngectomy at Alexandria Main University Hospital, Egypt. Patients with tumor extension to the hypopharynx or base of the tongue were excluded from the study. The surgical time is reduced with shorter hospital stays and no increase in postoperative complications rate. The use of the stapler is technically easy to perform and as equally as effective as the traditional neopharyngeal suturing techniques in patients undergoing total laryngectomy.

Citing Articles

A Novel Technique: Stapler-Assisted Total Laryngectomy with Concurrent Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis Insertion.

Bollu S, Arora S, Bhatia K, Kaur G, Garg A Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(5):4667-4672.

PMID: 39376284 PMC: 11456010. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-04754-0.


Stapler versus conventional pharyngeal repair after total laryngectomy: a randomized clinical trial.

Mandor E, Ebada H, Abd El-Fattah A, Kamal E, Baz H, Tawfik A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(8):4273-4280.

PMID: 38739184 PMC: 11266385. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08696-9.


Stapler Pharyngeal Repair Versus Conventional Suturing After Laryngectomy in Jordanian Laryngeal Cancer Patients.

Algargaz W, Mohamad I, Eid S, Khanfar A, Abushukair H Med Arch. 2022; 76(5):363-367.

PMID: 36545454 PMC: 9760230. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2022.76.363-367.

References
1.
Backemar L, Lagergren P, Johar A, Lagergren J . Impact of co-morbidity on mortality after oesophageal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(9):1097-105. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9854. View

2.
Hoehn J, Payne W . Resection of pharyngoesophageal diverticulum using stapling device. Mayo Clin Proc. 1969; 44(10):738-41. View

3.
Agrawal A, Schuller D . Closed laryngectomy using the automatic linear stapling device. Laryngoscope. 2000; 110(8):1402-5. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200008000-00034. View

4.
Parikh S, Irish J, Curran A, Gullane P, Brown D, Rotstein L . Pharyngocutaneous fistulae in laryngectomy patients: the Toronto Hospital experience. J Otolaryngol. 1998; 27(3):136-40. View

5.
Ozturk K, Turhal G, Ozturk A, Kaya I, Akyildiz S, Uluoz U . The Comparative Analysis of Suture versus Linear Stapler Pharyngeal Closure in Total Laryngectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 57(4):166-170. PMC: 7032550. DOI: 10.5152/tao.2019.4469. View