» Articles » PMID: 36452062

Airway Management in Adult Intensive Care Units: A Survey of Two Regions in China

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2022 Dec 1
PMID 36452062
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The critical medicine residency training in China started in 2020, but no investigation on the practice of tracheal intubation in ICUs in China has been conducted. A survey was sent to the adult ICUs in public hospitals in Shenzhen (SZ) city and Xinjiang (XJ) province using a WeChat miniprogram to be completed by intensive care physicians. It included questions on training on intubation, intubation procedures, and changes in the use of personal protective equipment due to COVID-19. We analyzed 301 valid questionnaires which were from 72 hospitals. A total of 37% of respondents had completed training in RSI (SZ, 40% vs. XJ, 30%; = 0.066), and 50% had participated in a course on the emergency front of the neck airway (SZ, 47% vs. XJ, 54%; = 0.256). Video laryngoscopy was preferred by 75% of respondents. Manual ventilation (56%) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (34%) were the first-line options for preoxygenation. For patients with a high risk of aspiration, nasogastric decompression (47%) and cricoid pressure (37%) were administered. Propofol (82%) and midazolam (70%) were the most commonly used induction agents. Only 19% of respondents routinely used neuromuscular blocking agents. For patients with difficult airways, a flexible endoscope was the most commonly used device by 76% of respondents. Most participants (77%) believed that the COVID-19 pandemic had significantly increased their awareness of the need for personal protective equipment during tracheal intubation. Our survey demonstrated that the ICU doctors in these areas lack adequate training in airway management.

Citing Articles

Comparison of intravenous nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine in combination with lidocaine aerosol inhalation in awake direct laryngoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Li X, Xie C, Wu Y, Zhong W, Lu Y, Li Y Perioper Med (Lond). 2024; 13(1):105.

PMID: 39427184 PMC: 11490102. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00461-0.

References
1.
Turner J, Ellender T, Okonkwo E, Stepsis T, Stevens A, Sembroski E . Feasibility of  upright patient positioning and intubation success rates At two academic EDs. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35(7):986-992. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.011. View

2.
Lapinsky S . Endotracheal intubation in the ICU. Crit Care. 2015; 19:258. PMC: 4470089. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0964-z. View

3.
Contini C, Caselli E, Martini F, Maritati M, Torreggiani E, Seraceni S . COVID-19 Is a Multifaceted Challenging Pandemic Which Needs Urgent Public Health Interventions. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(8). PMC: 7464234. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8081228. View

4.
Lascarrou J, Boisrame-Helms J, Bailly A, Le Thuaut A, Kamel T, Mercier E . Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy on Successful First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation Among ICU Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017; 317(5):483-493. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.20603. View

5.
Ramkumar V, Umesh G, Philip F . Preoxygenation with 20º head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults. J Anesth. 2011; 25(2):189-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-011-1098-3. View