» Articles » PMID: 36451695

Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Caregivers' Quality of Life

Abstract

Purpose: The survival rate of pediatric patients undergoing liver transplantation has increased considerably. Despite this, the period after transplantation is still complex and poses several challenges to the recipient's family, which is responsible for care management. Recently, more attention has been paid to the impact of this complex procedure on the quality of life of caregivers. Hence, this study is aimed at assessing the quality of life of caregivers of patients who have undergone liver transplantation and the aspects that influence it.

Methods: This was an observational and cross-sectional study. From November 2020 to January 2021, short-form-36 questionnaires and additional questions were given to the main caregivers of children and adolescents who underwent pediatric liver transplantation.

Results: Thirty-eight questionnaires were completed and the results revealed a lower quality of life in comparison to Brazilian standards, primarily in the mental domains (41.8±14.1 vs. 51.1±2.8; <0.001). It did not show a significant association with socioeconomic or transplant-related factors, but it did show a negative impact on parents' perception of the child's health. Parents who reported worse health status for their children had a lower mental quality of life (44.1±13.8 vs. 33.3±12.6; <0.05).

Conclusion: The caregivers of transplanted children have a lower quality of life than those of the local population. Psychological assistance should be routinely provided to parents for long-term follow-up to mitigate potential negative effects on the transplanted child's care.

Citing Articles

Neuropsychological and biopsychosocial evolution, therapeutic adherence and unmet care needs during paediatric transplantation: study protocol of a mixed-methods design (observational cohort study and focus groups) - the TransplantKIDS mental health....

Garrido-Bolton J, Alcami-Pertejo M, Vega R, Hernandez-Oliveros F, Perez-Martinez A, Bravo-Ortiz M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1308418.

PMID: 38449767 PMC: 10915199. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308418.

References
1.
Jimenez-Rivera C, Jolin-Dahel K, Fortinsky K, Gozdyra P, Benchimol E . International incidence and outcomes of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012; 56(4):344-54. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318282a913. View

2.
Bowling A, Bond M, Jenkinson C, Lamping D . Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey. J Public Health Med. 1999; 21(3):255-70. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/21.3.255. View

3.
Kohli R, Cortes M, Heaton N, Dhawan A . Liver transplantation in children: state of the art and future perspectives. Arch Dis Child. 2017; 103(2):192-198. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310023. View

4.
Ware Jr J . SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3130-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008. View

5.
Mieli-Vergani G, Howard E, Portman B, Mowat A . Late referral for biliary atresia--missed opportunities for effective surgery. Lancet. 1989; 1(8635):421-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90012-3. View