» Articles » PMID: 36448714

Monitor Tumor PHe and Response Longitudinally During Treatment Using CEST MRI-Detectable Alginate Microbeads

Abstract

Imaging pHe of the tumor microenvironment has paramount importance for characterizing aggressive, invasive tumors, as well as therapeutic responses. Here, a robust approach to image pH changes in the tumor microenvironment longitudinally and during sodium bicarbonate treatment was reported. The pH-sensing microbeads were designed and prepared based on materials approved for clinical use, i.e., alginate microbead-containing computed tomography (CT) contrast-agent (iopamidol)-loaded liposomes (Iop-lipobeads). This Iop-lipobead prepared using a customized microfluidic device generated a CEST contrast of 10.6% at 4.2 ppm at pH 7.0, which was stable for 20 days in vitro. The CEST contrast decreased by 11.8% when the pH decreased from 7.0 to 6.5 in vitro. Optimized Iop-lipobeads next to tumors showed a significant increase of 19.7 ± 6.1% ( < 0.01) in CEST contrast at 4.2 ppm during the first 3 days of treatment and decreased to 15.2 ± 4.8% when treatment stopped. Notably, percentage changes in Iop-lipobeads were higher than that of amide CEST (11.7% and 9.1%) in tumors during and after treatment. These findings demonstrated that the Iop-lipobead could provide an independent and sensitive assessment of the pHe changes for a noninvasive and longitudinal monitoring of the treatment effects using multiple CEST contrast.

Citing Articles

Design Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Contrast Agents and Nanocarriers for Imaging Proton Exchange .

Su H, Chan K ACS Nano. 2024; 18(50):33775-33791.

PMID: 39642940 PMC: 11656841. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c05923.


Novel Nanoprobe with Combined Ultrasonography/Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Precise Diagnosis of Tumors.

Ding J, He L, Yang L, Cheng L, Zhao Z, Luo B Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(12).

PMID: 38140034 PMC: 10747786. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15122693.


Effect of Esomeprazole Treatment on Extracellular Tumor pH in a Preclinical Model of Prostate Cancer by MRI-CEST Tumor pH Imaging.

Irrera P, Roberto M, Consolino L, Anemone A, Villano D, Navarro-Tableros V Metabolites. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36676972 PMC: 9866131. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13010048.

References
1.
Huang J, Chen Z, Park S, Lai J, Chan K . Molecular Imaging of Brain Tumors and Drug Delivery Using CEST MRI: Promises and Challenges. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(2). PMC: 8880023. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020451. View

2.
Ren J, Li J, Li Y, Xiao P, Liu Y, Tsang C . Elasticity-Modulated Microbeads for Classification of Floating Normal and Cancer Cells Using Confining Microchannels. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021; 5(8):3889-3898. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01273. View

3.
Utech S, Prodanovic R, Mao A, Ostafe R, Mooney D, Weitz D . Microfluidic Generation of Monodisperse, Structurally Homogeneous Alginate Microgels for Cell Encapsulation and 3D Cell Culture. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015; 4(11):1628-33. PMC: 4529809. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201500021. View

4.
Demoin D, Wyatt L, Edwards K, Abdel-Atti D, Sarparanta M, Pourat J . PET Imaging of Extracellular pH in Tumors with (64)Cu- and (18)F-Labeled pHLIP Peptides: A Structure-Activity Optimization Study. Bioconjug Chem. 2016; 27(9):2014-23. PMC: 5034329. DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00306. View

5.
Longo D, Bartoli A, Consolino L, Bardini P, Arena F, Schwaiger M . In Vivo Imaging of Tumor Metabolism and Acidosis by Combining PET and MRI-CEST pH Imaging. Cancer Res. 2016; 76(22):6463-6470. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0825. View