Routine Clinical Care Creatinine Data in Denmark - An Epidemiological Resource for Nationwide Population-Based Studies of Kidney Disease

Purpose: Creatinine data are key in identifying acute and chronic kidney disease. In Denmark, routine clinical care creatinine data have been collected regionally in the Clinical Laboratory Information System Research Database (LABKA) since the 1990s and nationwide in the Register of Laboratory Results for Research (RLRR) since 2013. Here we describe the geographical coverage of the databases and characteristics of Danish individuals with creatinine tests. This information is pivotal for the design and interpretation of studies using these data to examine kidney disease epidemiology.

Patients And Methods: We included all creatinine tests in LABKA and RLRR from 1990 through 2018. The daily number of creatinine tests by municipality and region of residence were plotted and geographical coverage was ascertained. In addition, we characterized a contemporary cohort of creatinine-tested individuals in 2016-2018.

Results: During 1990-2018, 61,011,941 creatinine tests were available for 4,647,966 unique Danish residents. The North Denmark Region was the first region to achieve complete reporting in November 2004, and nationwide reporting was complete starting in October 2015. In each year from 2016 to 2018, more than a third of Danish residents had a recorded creatinine measurement, with the highest proportion of tested individuals aged 77-87 years and the lowest proportion aged 3-5 years. During 2016-2018, the creatinine-tested cohort had a median age of 53 years (IQR, 35-67 years) and included 54.3% women. The most common comorbidity was a hospital-based diagnosis of hypertension (12.0%), and the most common prescription drug was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (15.8%).

Conclusion: In combination, the population-based LABKA and RLRR databases provide regional creatinine data with long follow-up and nationwide data for the Danish population. There was considerable variation in the time of complete geographical coverage by region, which needs to be considered when using these data for studies on kidney disease epidemiology.