» Articles » PMID: 36440751

Cross-Modality Evidence for Reduced Choice History Biases in Psychosis-Prone Individuals

Overview
Journal Schizophr Bull
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 Nov 28
PMID 36440751
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Predictive processing posits that perception emerges from inferential processes within a hierarchical cortical system. Alterations of these processes may result in psychotic experiences, such as hallucinations and delusions. Central to the predictive processing account of psychosis is the notion of aberrant weights attributed to prior information and sensory input. Based on the notion that previous perceptual choices represent a relevant source of prior information, we here asked whether the propensity towards psychotic experiences may be related to altered choice history biases in perceptual decision-making.

Methods: We investigated the relationship between choice history biases in perceptual decision-making and psychosis proneness in the general population. Choice history biases and their adaptation to experimentally induced changes in stimulus serial dependencies were investigated in decision-making tasks with auditory (experiment 1) and visual (experiment 2) stimuli. We further explored a potential compensatory mechanism for reduced choice history biases by reliance on predictive cross-modal cues.

Results: In line with our preregistered hypothesis, psychosis proneness was associated with decreased choice history biases in both experiments. This association is generalized across conditions with and without stimulus serial dependencies. We did not find consistent evidence for a compensatory reliance on cue information in psychosis-prone individuals across experiments.

Conclusions: Our results show reduced choice history biases in psychosis proneness. A compensatory mechanism between implicit choice history effects and explicit cue information is not supported unequivocally by our data.

Citing Articles

Opposing serial effects of stimulus and choice in speech perception scale with context variability.

Ufer C, Blank H iScience. 2024; 27(9):110611.

PMID: 39252961 PMC: 11382034. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110611.


Bayesian accounts of perceptual decisions in the nonclinical continuum of psychosis: Greater imprecision in both top-down and bottom-up processes.

Goodwin I, Kugel J, Hester R, Garrido M PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(11):e1011670.

PMID: 37988398 PMC: 10697609. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011670.


Resolving the Delusion Paradox.

Petrovic P, Sterzer P Schizophr Bull. 2023; 49(6):1425-1436.

PMID: 37478890 PMC: 10686356. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbad084.

References
1.
Yu A, Cohen J . Sequential effects: Superstition or rational behavior?. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015; 21:1873-1880. PMC: 4580342. View

2.
King D, Hodgekins J, Chouinard P, Chouinard V, Sperandio I . A review of abnormalities in the perception of visual illusions in schizophrenia. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016; 24(3):734-751. PMC: 5486866. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1168-5. View

3.
Collins T . Serial dependence alters perceived object appearance. J Vis. 2020; 20(13):9. PMC: 7735946. DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.13.9. View

4.
Papadimitriou C, White 3rd R, Snyder L . Ghosts in the Machine II: Neural Correlates of Memory Interference from the Previous Trial. Cereb Cortex. 2016; 27(4):2513-2527. PMC: 6059123. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw106. View

5.
Fletcher P, Frith C . Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 10(1):48-58. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2536. View