» Articles » PMID: 36440049

Risk Stratification in Adult and Pediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Currently, risk stratification is the cornerstone of determining treatment strategy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension recommended risk assessment, the number of studies reporting risk stratification has considerably increased. This systematic review aims to report and compare the variables and prognostic value of the various risk stratification models for outcome prediction in adult and pediatric PAH.

Methods: A systematic search with terms related to PAH, pediatric pulmonary hypertension, and risk stratification was performed through databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to June 8, 2022. Observational studies and clinical trials on risk stratification in adult and pediatric PAH were included, excluding case reports/series, guidelines, and reviews. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool. Data on the variables used in the models and the predictive strength of the models given by c-statistic were extracted from eligible studies.

Results: A total of 74 studies were eligible for inclusion, with this review focusing on model development ( = 21), model validation ( = 13), and model enhancement ( = 9). The variables used most often in current risk stratification models were the non-invasive WHO functional class, 6-minute walk distance and BNP/NT-proBNP, and the invasive mean right atrial pressure, cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation. C-statistics of current risk stratification models range from 0.56 to 0.83 in adults and from 0.69 to 0.78 in children (only two studies available). Risk stratification models focusing solely on echocardiographic parameters or biomarkers have also been reported.

Conclusion: Studies reporting risk stratification in pediatric PAH are scarce. This systematic review provides an overview of current data on risk stratification models and its value for guiding treatment strategies in PAH.

Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022316885], identifier [CRD42022316885].

Citing Articles

Survival, morbidity, and quality of life in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients: a systematic review of outcomes reported by population-based observational studies.

Reinders S, Didden E, Ong R Respir Res. 2024; 25(1):373.

PMID: 39415261 PMC: 11481430. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-02994-w.


Embracing the challenges of neonatal and paediatric pulmonary hypertension.

Ivy D, Rosenzweig E, Abman S, Beghetti M, Bonnet D, Douwes J Eur Respir J. 2024; 64(4).

PMID: 39209483 PMC: 11525338. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01345-2024.


Editorial: Therapeutics in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Adao R, Perez-Vizcaino F, Redwan B, Bras-Silva C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1463305.

PMID: 39165259 PMC: 11333342. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1463305.


Prognostic Value of Serial Risk Stratification in Adult and Pediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review.

Lokhorst C, van der Werf S, Berger R, Douwes J J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(13):e034151.

PMID: 38904230 PMC: 11255703. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034151.


Growing up with Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: An Arduous Journey.

Dutilleux T, Farhat N, Heying R, Seghaye M, Beghetti M Pediatr Rep. 2023; 15(2):301-310.

PMID: 37218926 PMC: 10204495. DOI: 10.3390/pediatric15020026.


References
1.
Harbaum L, Fuge J, Kamp J, Hennigs J, Simon M, Sinning C . Blood carbon dioxide tension and risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2020; 318:131-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.06.069. View

2.
Lewis R, Johns C, Cogliano M, Capener D, Tubman E, Elliot C . Identification of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Thresholds for Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019; 201(4):458-468. PMC: 7049935. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1771OC. View

3.
Simpson C, Griffiths M, Yang J, Nies M, Vaidya R, Brandal S . The angiostatic peptide endostatin enhances mortality risk prediction in pulmonary arterial hypertension. ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(4. PMC: 8503279. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00378-2021. View

4.
DAlonzo G, Barst R, Ayres S, Bergofsky E, Brundage B, Detre K . Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 115(5):343-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-5-343. View

5.
Hoeper M, Kramer T, Pan Z, Eichstaedt C, Spiesshoefer J, Benjamin N . Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prediction by the 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines risk stratification model. Eur Respir J. 2017; 50(2). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00740-2017. View