» Articles » PMID: 36439985

Observed Electric Charge of Insect Swarms and Their Contribution to Atmospheric Electricity

Overview
Journal iScience
Publisher Cell Press
Date 2022 Nov 28
PMID 36439985
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The atmosphere hosts multiple sources of electric charge that influence critical processes such as the aggregation of droplets and the removal of dust and aerosols. This is evident in the variability of the atmospheric electric field. Whereas these electric fields are known to respond to physical and geological processes, the effect of biotic sources of charge has not hitherto been considered. Here, we combine theoretical and empirical evidence to demonstrate that honeybee swarms directly contribute to atmospheric electricity, in proportion to the swarm density. We provide a quantitative assessment of this finding, by comparing the electrical contribution of various swarming insect species with common abiotic sources of charge. This reveals that the charge contribution of some insect swarms will be comparable with that of meteorologically induced variations. The observed transport of charge by insects therefore demonstrates an unexplored role of biogenic space charge for physical and ecological processes in the atmosphere.

Citing Articles

Electric transportation and electroreception in hummingbird flower mites.

Garcia-Robledo C, Dierick D, Manser K Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(5):e2419214122.

PMID: 39869792 PMC: 11804690. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2419214122.


Electrostatic pollination by butterflies and moths.

England S, Robert D J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(216):20240156.

PMID: 39044626 PMC: 11267234. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0156.


Prey can detect predators via electroreception in air.

England S, Robert D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(23):e2322674121.

PMID: 38768327 PMC: 11161757. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2322674121.


An analysis of time-varying dynamics in electrically sensitive arthropod hairs to understand real-world electrical sensing.

Palmer R, OReilly L, Carpenter J, Chenchiah I, Robert D J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(205):20230177.

PMID: 37553992 PMC: 10410214. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0177.


Static electricity passively attracts ticks onto hosts.

England S, Lihou K, Robert D Curr Biol. 2023; 33(14):3041-3047.e4.

PMID: 37392744 PMC: 7616434. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.021.


References
1.
U K . Insects as unidentified flying objects: comment. Appl Opt. 2010; 18(16):2723-4. DOI: 10.1364/AO.18.002723. View

2.
de Groot G, Geisen S, Jasper Wubs E, Meulenbroek L, Laros I, Snoek L . The aerobiome uncovered: Multi-marker metabarcoding reveals potential drivers of turn-over in the full microbial community in the air. Environ Int. 2021; 154:106551. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106551. View

3.
Hu G, Lim K, Horvitz N, Clark S, Reynolds D, Sapir N . Mass seasonal bioflows of high-flying insect migrants. Science. 2016; 354(6319):1584-1587. DOI: 10.1126/science.aah4379. View

4.
Hunting E, England S, Koh K, Lawson D, Brun N, Robert D . Synthetic fertilizers alter floral biophysical cues and bumblebee foraging behavior. PNAS Nexus. 2023; 1(5):pgac230. PMC: 9802097. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac230. View

5.
Hunting E, Matthews J, de Arroyabe Hernaez P, England S, Kourtidis K, Koh K . Challenges in coupling atmospheric electricity with biological systems. Int J Biometeorol. 2020; 65(1):45-58. PMC: 7782408. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-020-01960-7. View