» Articles » PMID: 36434939

Can a Chest HRCT-based Crash Course on COVID-19 Cases Make Inexperienced Thoracic Radiologists Readily Available to Face the Next Pandemic?

Overview
Journal Clin Imaging
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Nov 26
PMID 36434939
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To test the inter-reader agreement in assessing lung disease extent, HRCT signs, and Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) categorization between a chest-devoted radiologist (CR) and two HRCT-naïve radiology residents (RR1 and RR2) after the latter attended a COVID-19-based chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) "crash course".

Methods: The course was built by retrospective inclusion of 150 patients who underwent HRCT for COVID-19 pneumonia between November 2020 and January 2021. During a first 10-days-long "training phase", RR1 and RR2 read a pool of 100/150 HRCTs, receiving day-by-day access to CR reports as feedback. In the subsequent 2-days-long "test phase", they were asked to report 50/150 HRCTs with no feedback. Test phase reports of RR1/RR2 were then compared with CR using unweighted or linearly-weighted Cohen's kappa (k) statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: We observed almost perfect agreement in assessing disease extent between RR1-CR (k = 0.83, p < 0.001) and RR2-CR (k = 0.88, p < 0.001). The agreement between RR1-CR and RR2-CR on consolidation, crazy paving pattern, organizing pneumonia (OP) pattern, and pulmonary artery (PA) diameter was substantial (k = 0.65 and k = 0.68), moderate (k = 0.42 and k = 0.51), slight (k = 0.10 and k = 0.20), and good-to-excellent (ICC = 0.87 and ICC = 0.91), respectively. The agreement in providing RSNA categorization was moderate for R1 versus CR (k = 0.56) and substantial for R2 versus CR (k = 0.67).

Conclusion: HRCT-naïve readers showed an acceptable overall agreement with CR, supporting the hypothesis that a crash course can be a tool to readily make non-subspecialty radiologists available to cooperate in reading high burden of HRCT examinations during a pandemic/epidemic.

References
1.
Zhang R, Ouyang H, Fu L, Wang S, Han J, Huang K . CT features of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia according to clinical presentation: a retrospective analysis of 120 consecutive patients from Wuhan city. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(8):4417-4426. PMC: 7150608. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06854-1. View

2.
Ko S, Lee T, Huang C, Cheng Y, Ng S, Kuo Y . Severe acute respiratory syndrome: prognostic implications of chest radiographic findings in 52 patients. Radiology. 2004; 233(1):173-81. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2323031547. View

3.
Menni C, Valdes A, Polidori L, Antonelli M, Penamakuri S, Nogal A . Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of omicron and delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study. Lancet. 2022; 399(10335):1618-1624. PMC: 8989396. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00327-0. View

4.
Li K, Wu J, Wu F, Guo D, Chen L, Fang Z . The Clinical and Chest CT Features Associated With Severe and Critical COVID-19 Pneumonia. Invest Radiol. 2020; 55(6):327-331. PMC: 7147273. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000672. View

5.
Kadirvelu B, Burcea G, Quint J, Costelloe C, Faisal A . Variation in global COVID-19 symptoms by geography and by chronic disease: A global survey using the COVID-19 Symptom Mapper. EClinicalMedicine. 2022; 45:101317. PMC: 8898170. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101317. View