» Articles » PMID: 36434876

Macroscopic Hematuria As an Initial Symptom of Testicular Cancer, an Unusual Presentation and Initial Management. A Case Report

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Nov 26
PMID 36434876
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The most common causes of hematuria are lower urinary tract infections, especially of the bladder, urolithiasis, urogenital tumors or benign prostatic hyperplasia; consequently, this condition presents the greatest clinical challenge due to its broad clinical spectrum, hematuria is an atypical form of presentation of testicular tumors, with very few cases reported in the literature, reaffirming the importance of a complete examination when approaching hematuria in the emergency department.

Case Presentation: We present a case of a 31-year-old patient who presented to the emergency department with macroscopic hematuria of 5 weeks of evolution, showing on examination a mass in the left testicle. Imaging studies showed bilateral pulmonary metastatic lesions and retroperitoneal lymph node activity with a retrocaval conglomerate infiltrating the left ureter, for which a radical left orchiectomy and multiple procedures were performed to resolve the hematuria.

Discussion: Macroscopic hematuria in adolescents or young adults is an infrequent cause of admission to the Emergency Department with a large list of differential diagnoses both benign and malignant so it is necessary to perform exhaustive studies in its approach, when young patients present with a painless testicular mass, it is important to keep testicular cancer within the differential diagnoses, metastatic disease is a rare form of presentation in this type of tumors. The relevance of this clinical case lies in the fact that hematuria was the main symptom that brought the patient to the emergency department, so we must not forget that macroscopic hematuria should be extensively studied.

Conclusion: When approaching a patient with macroscopic hematuria, the clinical history and physical examination is extremely important to provide the best possible care and focus the treatment properly.

References
1.
Ark J, Alvarez J, Koyama T, Bassett J, Blot W, Mumma M . Variation in the Diagnostic Evaluation among Persons with Hematuria: Influence of Gender, Race and Risk Factors for Bladder Cancer. J Urol. 2017; 198(5):1033-1038. PMC: 5827951. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.083. View

2.
Tan W, Feber A, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P, Rodney S, Jalil R . Who Should Be Investigated for Haematuria? Results of a Contemporary Prospective Observational Study of 3556 Patients. Eur Urol. 2018; 74(1):10-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.008. View

3.
Germa-Lluch J, Garcia Del Muro X, Maroto P, Paz-Ares L, Arranz J, Guma J . Clinical pattern and therapeutic results achieved in 1490 patients with germ-cell tumours of the testis: the experience of the Spanish Germ-Cell Cancer Group (GG). Eur Urol. 2002; 42(6):553-62; discussion 562-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00439-6. View

4.
Rodgers M, Nixon J, Hempel S, Aho T, Kelly J, Neal D . Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006; 10(18):iii-iv, xi-259. DOI: 10.3310/hta10180. View

5.
Buntinx F, Wauters H . The diagnostic value of macroscopic haematuria in diagnosing urological cancers: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 1997; 14(1):63-8. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.63. View