» Articles » PMID: 36429980

A Systematic Review on Modeling Methods and Influential Factors for Mapping Dengue-Related Risk in Urban Settings

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Nov 26
PMID 36429980
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dengue fever is an acute mosquito-borne disease that mostly spreads within urban or semi-urban areas in warm climate zones. The dengue-related risk map is one of the most practical tools for executing effective control policies, breaking the transmission chain, and preventing disease outbreaks. Mapping risk at a small scale, such as at an urban level, can demonstrate the spatial heterogeneities in complicated built environments. This review aims to summarize state-of-the-art modeling methods and influential factors in mapping dengue fever risk in urban settings. Data were manually extracted from five major academic search databases following a set of querying and selection criteria, and a total of 28 studies were analyzed. Twenty of the selected papers investigated the spatial pattern of dengue risk by epidemic data, whereas the remaining eight papers developed an entomological risk map as a proxy for potential dengue burden in cities or agglomerated urban regions. The key findings included: (1) Big data sources and emerging data-mining techniques are innovatively employed for detecting hot spots of dengue-related burden in the urban context; (2) Bayesian approaches and machine learning algorithms have become more popular as spatial modeling tools for predicting the distribution of dengue incidence and mosquito presence; (3) Climatic and built environmental variables are the most common factors in making predictions, though the effects of these factors vary with the mosquito species; (4) Socio-economic data may be a better representation of the huge heterogeneity of risk or vulnerability spatial distribution on an urban scale. In conclusion, for spatially assessing dengue-related risk in an urban context, data availability and the purpose for mapping determine the analytical approaches and modeling methods used. To enhance the reliabilities of predictive models, sufficient data about dengue serotyping, socio-economic status, and spatial connectivity may be more important for mapping dengue-related risk in urban settings for future studies.

Citing Articles

Geographic information system & epidemiological trends of dengue serotypes.

Daungsupawong H, Wiwanitkit V Indian J Med Res. 2024; 160(1):40.

PMID: 39382507 PMC: 11463859. DOI: 10.25259/IJMR_332_2024.


Perspectives and challenges in developing and implementing integrated dengue surveillance tools and technology in Thailand: a qualitative study.

Rotejanaprasert C, Armatrmontree P, Chienwichai P, Maude R PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(8):e0012387.

PMID: 39141623 PMC: 11324148. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012387.


Climate change, thermal anomalies, and the recent progression of dengue in Brazil.

Barcellos C, Matos V, Lana R, Lowe R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5948.

PMID: 38467690 PMC: 10928122. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56044-y.


Increasing transmission of dengue virus across ecologically diverse regions of Ecuador and associated risk factors.

Katzelnick L, Quentin E, Colston S, Ha T, Andrade P, Eisenberg J PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(1):e0011408.

PMID: 38295108 PMC: 10861087. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011408.


A systematic review of the data, methods and environmental covariates used to map Aedes-borne arbovirus transmission risk.

Lim A, Jafari Y, Caldwell J, Clapham H, Gaythorpe K, Hussain-Alkhateeb L BMC Infect Dis. 2023; 23(1):708.

PMID: 37864153 PMC: 10588093. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08717-8.


References
1.
Ong J, Liu X, Rajarethinam J, Kok S, Liang S, Tang C . Mapping dengue risk in Singapore using Random Forest. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018; 12(6):e0006587. PMC: 6023234. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006587. View

2.
Yin M, Bicout D, Haddawy P, Schoning J, Laosiritaworn Y, Sa-Angchai P . Added-value of mosquito vector breeding sites from street view images in the risk mapping of dengue incidence in Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021; 15(3):e0009122. PMC: 7971869. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009122. View

3.
Estallo E, Sangermano F, Grech M, Luduena-Almeida F, Frias-Cespedes M, Ainete M . Modelling the distribution of the vector Aedes aegypti in a central Argentine city. Med Vet Entomol. 2018; 32(4):451-461. DOI: 10.1111/mve.12323. View

4.
Rogers D, Wilson A, Hay S, Graham A . The global distribution of yellow fever and dengue. Adv Parasitol. 2006; 62:181-220. PMC: 3164798. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)62006-4. View

5.
Pham N, Nguyen C, Vu H . Assessing and modelling vulnerability to dengue in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam by geospatial and time-series approaches. Environ Res. 2020; 186:109545. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109545. View