» Articles » PMID: 36425845

Bull Selection and Management in Extensive Rangeland Production Systems of California: a Producer Survey

Overview
Journal Transl Anim Sci
Date 2022 Nov 25
PMID 36425845
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

California's approximately 660,000 head of beef cattle are highly dependent on range bulls used to produce offspring that can perform across the state's diverse ecological regions. Bulls need to be functional on rugged coastal landscapes, rolling foothills, deserts, and in high-elevation terrain. Few data exist that indicate factors related to selection, maintenance, and longevity of bulls used in rangeland landscapes. Objectives herein, were to assess factors influencing bull purchasing, management, and culling decisions of California beef producers. Surveys were mailed to the California Cattlemen's Association membership ( = 1,410) with ~ 16% response rate ( = 227). Mean age and years of bull selection experience of respondents was 61 ± 1 yr and 27 ± 1 yr, respectively. Respondents managed cattle on a total of 694,949 hectare of owned, private leased, and leased public rangelands in California and surrounding states. Cow-calf herd size was 333 ± 92 head and bull battery averaged 18 ± 2 head with average bull longevity of 5 ± 1.3 yr. The average price paid for bulls in the last 2 yr was $5007 ± 163.33, while the highest price paid in the last 5 yr was $7291 ± 335.40. Survey responses were used to define current factors driving management after purchase and for subsequent breeding seasons. After bull purchase, 48% of producers turned bulls out directly with females, while 52% held bulls until the following breeding season. Additionally, most producers (70%) did not manage bulls to reduce condition after purchase. Semen quality analysis, a major component of a breeding soundness exam, was evaluated annually by 45% of respondents, while 20% of respondents never evaluated semen quality. Respondents indicated bull age (35%) and structural soundness (29%) as the most common factors for culling bulls. This research shows that despite the variability in operation demographics, there were similarities in beef bull selection and management across the state. Additionally, these data suggest the need for additional research focused on bull selection and management to maximize producer investment in reproduction.

Citing Articles

Divergent planes of nutrition in mature rams influences body composition, hormone and metabolite concentrations, and offspring birth measurements, but not semen characteristics or offspring growth.

Bochantin-Winders K, Baumgaertner F, Hurlbert J, Menezes A, Kirsch J, Dorsam S J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 39044680 PMC: 11347781. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae207.


Evaluation of Aberdeen Angus Breeding Bulls in the Northern Region of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Shevchenko P, Micinski J, Brel-Kisseleva I Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38539992 PMC: 10967624. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060894.

References
1.
Martin K, Henderson J, Brewer M . Bovine Trichomonosis Cases in the United States 2015-2019. Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:692199. PMC: 8382153. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.692199. View

2.
Schuma G, Janzen H, Herrick J . Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands. Environ Pollut. 2002; 116(3):391-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00215-9. View

3.
Kastelic J, Thundathil J . Breeding soundness evaluation and semen analysis for predicting bull fertility. Reprod Domest Anim. 2008; 43 Suppl 2:368-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01186.x. View

4.
Rae D, Crews J . Tritrichomonas foetus. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2006; 22(3):595-611. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2006.07.001. View

5.
Michi A, Favetto P, Kastelic J, Cobo E . A review of sexually transmitted bovine trichomoniasis and campylobacteriosis affecting cattle reproductive health. Theriogenology. 2015; 85(5):781-791. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.10.037. View