» Articles » PMID: 36425603

A Preliminary Evaluation of Tick Cement-cone Protein Extract for a Vaccine Against Infestation

Overview
Journal Iran J Vet Res
Date 2022 Nov 25
PMID 36425603
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Vaccines have been widely exploited to prevent tick-borne infections in cattle. Most vaccines have faced failure in the field because of inconsistency in an immune response. It is presumed that the cement-cone proteins of ticks that participate in the acquisition of blood meal for ticks possess strong immune-stimulating properties and, hence, could be a useful candidate in vaccine development.

Aims: We evaluated cement-cone proteins of tick as a vaccine candidate against infestations of and in cattle.

Methods: The cement-cone proteins were extracted from to develop stage-reactive and immunogenic cross-reactive vaccine against the infestation of two species of ticks and . The immune response of the vaccine was tested against cement-cone proteins starved, partially fed, and richly fed ticks.

Results: The findings of the present study demonstrated the cross-reactivity among the two species of ticks that belonged to the same genus (). The antigenic similarity between the two ticks species suggests that a common antigen may possibly be suitable for a vaccine against the two different species of ticks. The results have also indicated that the 23 kDa cement-cone protein of and may be responsible for the induction, or elicitation of immunogenic, common stage reactive, and cross-reactive host immune responses with consistent intensity throughout the life stages of ticks.

Conclusion: The vaccine based upon cement-cone proteins of ticks may be a useful deterrent against tick-borne infections in cattle in countries like Pakistan.

Citing Articles

Tick Vaccines and Concealed versus Exposed Antigens.

Antunes S, Domingos A Pathogens. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36986295 PMC: 10056810. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12030374.

References
1.
Akel T, Mobarakai N . Hematologic manifestations of babesiosis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017; 16(1):6. PMC: 5310009. DOI: 10.1186/s12941-017-0179-z. View

2.
Merino O, Almazan C, Canales M, Villar M, Moreno-Cid J, Estrada-Pena A . Control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus infestations by the combination of subolesin vaccination and tick autocidal control after subolesin gene knockdown in ticks fed on cattle. Vaccine. 2011; 29(12):2248-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.050. View

3.
Wikel S . Ticks and Tick-Borne Infections: Complex Ecology, Agents, and Host Interactions. Vet Sci. 2018; 5(2). PMC: 6024845. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci5020060. View

4.
Opdebeeck J, Wong J, Jackson L, Dobson C . Vaccines to protect Hereford cattle against the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Immunology. 1988; 63(3):363-7. PMC: 1454765. View

5.
Awumbila B . Acaricides in tick control in Ghana and methods of application. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1996; 28(2 Suppl):50S-52S. DOI: 10.1007/BF02310699. View