» Articles » PMID: 36422080

Factors Influencing the Difficulty and Need for External Help During Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Analysis of 485 Procedures from the Resident-1 Multicentre Trial

Abstract

Purpose: To identify preoperative predictive factors for technically challenging laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and the need for external help to laparoscopically complete the procedure. Methods: We analysed data from a two-year data lock on the Resident-1 multicentre registry. The operator classified each procedure following a five-grade Likert scale to define technical difficulty. We performed univariate analysis comparing Grade 1−3 versus 4−5 procedures and then built a logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of Grade 4−5 procedures defined as needing external help to complete a LA. Results: 561 patients were recruited from 2019 to 2021, and 485 patients were included in the final analysis due to missing data. A BMI > 30 kg/m2, preoperative CT scan, and the AIR score were independent preoperative predictors of complex LA with the need for external help to be completed. Patients undergoing such procedures were more affected by CA, had longer operative times, and had the worst postoperative outcomes. Conclusion: The preoperative identification of technically demanding LA could be helpful in optimising the preoperative planning, maximise surgeons’ preparedness, and include expert surgeons in the procedure earlier. Creating a scoring system for the technical difficulty of LA is desirable.

Citing Articles

Internal and external factors affecting the performance score of surgical trainees doing laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, observational cohort study in a structured training programme.

Skjold-Odegaard B, Ersdal H, Assmus J, Soreide K Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(9):4939-4946.

PMID: 38977503 PMC: 11362477. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11007-2.


Defining Surgical Difficulty During Open Right Lobe Donor Hepatectomy and its Prediction Using Preoperative Donor Computed Tomography Morphometry.

Patcha R, Muppala N, Malleeswaran S, Gopal P, Katheresan V, Kumar S J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024; 14(6):101446.

PMID: 38946865 PMC: 11214306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101446.

References
1.
Watanabe J, Tatsumi K, Ota M, Suwa Y, Suzuki S, Watanabe A . The impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 29(3):343-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1803-9. View

2.
Panteleimonitis S, Popeskou S, Harper M, Kandala N, Figueiredo N, Qureshi T . Minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the morbid obese: does size really matter?. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32(8):3486-3494. PMC: 6061053. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6068-5. View

3.
Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A . Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020; 15(1):27. PMC: 7386163. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3. View

4.
Russolillo N, Maina C, Fleres F, Langella S, Lo Tesoriere R, Ferrero A . Comparison and validation of three difficulty scoring systems in laparoscopic liver surgery: a retrospective analysis on 300 cases. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34(12):5484-5494. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07345-1. View

5.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View