» Articles » PMID: 36421201

Auditory Stimulation Improves Gait and Posture in Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review with Between- and Within-Group Meta-Analysis

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Nov 24
PMID 36421201
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The past decade has seen an increased interest in the implementation of auditory stimulation (AStim) for managing gait and postural deficits in people with cerebral palsy. Although existing reviews report beneficial effects of AStim on the spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters of gait, there are still numerous limitations that need to be addressed to correctly interpret these results. For instance, existing reviews have failed to characterize the effects of AStim by conducting separate between and within-group meta-analyses, these reviews have not evaluated the influence of AStim on postural outcomes, and nor have included several high-quality existing trials. In this study, we conducted between- and within-group meta-analyses to establish a state of evidence for the influence of AStim on gait and postural outcomes in people with cerebral palsy. We searched the literature according to PRISMA-P guidelines across 10 databases. Of 1414 records, 14 studies, including a total of 325 people with cerebral palsy, met the inclusion criterion. We report a significant enhancement in gait speed, stride length, cadence, and gross motor function (standing and walking) outcomes with AStim compared to conventional physiotherapy. The findings from this analysis reveal the beneficial influence of AStim on the spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters of gait and postural stability in people with cerebral palsy. Furthermore, we discuss the futurized implementation of smart wearables that can deliver person-centred AStim rehabilitation in people with cerebral palsy.

Citing Articles

Modelling individual variation in human walking gait across populations and walking conditions via gait recognition.

Duncanson K, Horst F, Abbasnejad E, Hanly G, Robertson W, Thewlis D J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(221):20240565.

PMID: 39657792 PMC: 11631418. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0565.


Rhythm and music for promoting sensorimotor organization in autism: broader implications for outcomes.

LaGasse B, Yoo G, Hardy M Front Integr Neurosci. 2024; 18:1403876.

PMID: 39040594 PMC: 11260726. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1403876.


A Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Verbal and Virtual Reality Feedback on Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

De Mulder T, Adams H, Dewit T, Molenaers G, Van Campenhout A, Desloovere K Children (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790520 PMC: 11120472. DOI: 10.3390/children11050524.


Novel Methods for Managing and Assessing Gait and Posture in Pediatric Population.

Ghai S Children (Basel). 2023; 10(6).

PMID: 37371208 PMC: 10297645. DOI: 10.3390/children10060976.


Effect of gait training using rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait speed in older adults admitted to convalescent rehabilitation wards: A study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.

Igusa T, Kobayashi T, Uchida H, Tsuchiya K, Akiba T, Sema S Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023; 33:101125.

PMID: 37091510 PMC: 10119504. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101125.


References
1.
Russell D, Avery L, Rosenbaum P, Raina P, Walter S, Palisano R . Improved scaling of the gross motor function measure for children with cerebral palsy: evidence of reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000; 80(9):873-85. View

2.
Parkes J, White-Koning M, Dickinson H, Thyen U, Arnaud C, Beckung E . Psychological problems in children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional European study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007; 49(4):405-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01845.x. View

3.
Guttmann K, Flibotte J, DeMauro S . Parental Perspectives on Diagnosis and Prognosis of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Graduates with Cerebral Palsy. J Pediatr. 2018; 203:156-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.089. View

4.
Valentine J, Thompson S . Issues relating to confounding and meta-analysis when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 4(1):26-35. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1064. View

5.
Ronsse R, Puttemans V, Coxon J, Goble D, Wagemans J, Wenderoth N . Motor learning with augmented feedback: modality-dependent behavioral and neural consequences. Cereb Cortex. 2010; 21(6):1283-94. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq209. View